Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12502 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- This article focuses on some properties of three tools used to measure economic inequalities with respect to a distribution of wealth $μ$: Gini coefficient $G$, Hoover coefficient or Robin Hood coefficient $H$, and the Lorenz concentration curve $L$. To express the distributions of resources, we use the framework of random variables and abstract Borel measures. In the first part (sections 1-4), we discuss alternate definitions of $G$, $H$ and $L$ that can be found in economics literature. Gini and Hoover coefficients are defined as mean deviation and mean absolute differences, and interpreted as geometrical properties of the Lorenz curve. In particular, we give a more general and straightforward proof of the main result of [Dorfman, 1979]. The second part of the article (section 5-7) focuses on the consistency of $G(μ)$, $H(μ)$ and $L_μ$ as $μ$ is approximated or perturbated. The relevant tool to use is the Wasserstein metric $\mathrm{W}_1$, i.e. the $\mathrm{L}^1$ metric between quantile functions. Our main theorem shows that if $\mathrm{W}_1(μ_n, μ_\infty) \to 0$ if and only if $L_{μ_n} \to L_{μ_\infty}$ uniformly. We discuss the topological implications of this fact. Thus, we show that the empirical Gini, Hoover indexes and Lorenz curves computed on a sample or rebuilt with partial information converge to the real Gini, Hoover indexes and Lorenz curve as information increases in several cases. Eventually, we discuss the situations where the $\mathrm{W}_1$ convergence is not matched but weaker asumptions can be made.