Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salido, Eva Sánchez, Morante, Roser, Gonzalo, Julio, Marco, Guillermo, Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Jorge, Plaza, Laura, Amigó, Enrique, Fernández, Andrés, Benito-Santos, Alejandro, Espinosa, Adrián Ghajari, Fresno, Victor
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12746
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909456276652032
author Salido, Eva Sánchez
Morante, Roser
Gonzalo, Julio
Marco, Guillermo
Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Jorge
Plaza, Laura
Amigó, Enrique
Fernández, Andrés
Benito-Santos, Alejandro
Espinosa, Adrián Ghajari
Fresno, Victor
author_facet Salido, Eva Sánchez
Morante, Roser
Gonzalo, Julio
Marco, Guillermo
Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Jorge
Plaza, Laura
Amigó, Enrique
Fernández, Andrés
Benito-Santos, Alejandro
Espinosa, Adrián Ghajari
Fresno, Victor
contents In this article we present UNED-ACCESS 2024, a bilingual dataset that consists of 1003 multiple-choice questions of university entrance level exams in Spanish and English. Questions are originally formulated in Spanish and translated manually into English, and have not ever been publicly released. A selection of current open-source and proprietary models are evaluated in a uniform zero-shot experimental setting both on the UNED-ACCESS 2024 dataset and on an equivalent subset of MMLU questions. Results show that (i) reasoning questions are challenging for models, (ii) smaller models perform worse than larger models and degrade faster in Spanish than in English and (iii) the performance gap between languages is negligible for the best models and grows up to 37% for smaller models. Model ranking on UNED-ACCESS 2024 is almost identical in English and Spanish, and has also a high correlation (0.98 Pearson) with ranking on MMLU, suggesting that a small dataset is sufficiently diverse and representative to measure performance by discipline.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_12746
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Bilingual Evaluation of Language Models on General Knowledge in University Entrance Exams with Minimal Contamination
Salido, Eva Sánchez
Morante, Roser
Gonzalo, Julio
Marco, Guillermo
Carrillo-de-Albornoz, Jorge
Plaza, Laura
Amigó, Enrique
Fernández, Andrés
Benito-Santos, Alejandro
Espinosa, Adrián Ghajari
Fresno, Victor
Computation and Language
In this article we present UNED-ACCESS 2024, a bilingual dataset that consists of 1003 multiple-choice questions of university entrance level exams in Spanish and English. Questions are originally formulated in Spanish and translated manually into English, and have not ever been publicly released. A selection of current open-source and proprietary models are evaluated in a uniform zero-shot experimental setting both on the UNED-ACCESS 2024 dataset and on an equivalent subset of MMLU questions. Results show that (i) reasoning questions are challenging for models, (ii) smaller models perform worse than larger models and degrade faster in Spanish than in English and (iii) the performance gap between languages is negligible for the best models and grows up to 37% for smaller models. Model ranking on UNED-ACCESS 2024 is almost identical in English and Spanish, and has also a high correlation (0.98 Pearson) with ranking on MMLU, suggesting that a small dataset is sufficiently diverse and representative to measure performance by discipline.
title Bilingual Evaluation of Language Models on General Knowledge in University Entrance Exams with Minimal Contamination
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12746