Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khaldi, Aymane, Khaldi, Rohaifa
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12900
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929506573352960
author Khaldi, Aymane
Khaldi, Rohaifa
author_facet Khaldi, Aymane
Khaldi, Rohaifa
contents Monitoring plankton distribution, particularly harmful phytoplankton, is vital for preserving aquatic ecosystems, regulating the global climate, and ensuring environmental protection. Traditional methods for monitoring are often time-consuming, expensive, error-prone, and unsuitable for large-scale applications, highlighting the need for accurate and efficient automated systems. In this study, we evaluate several state-of-the-art CNN models, including ResNet, ResNeXt, DenseNet, and EfficientNet, using three transfer learning approaches: linear probing, fine-tuning, and a combined approach, to classify eleven harmful phytoplankton genera from microscopic images. The best performance was achieved by ResNet-50 using the fine-tuning approach, with an accuracy of 96.97%. The results also revealed that the models struggled to differentiate between four harmful phytoplankton types with similar morphological features.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_12900
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Recognition of Harmful Phytoplankton from Microscopic Images using Deep Learning
Khaldi, Aymane
Khaldi, Rohaifa
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Monitoring plankton distribution, particularly harmful phytoplankton, is vital for preserving aquatic ecosystems, regulating the global climate, and ensuring environmental protection. Traditional methods for monitoring are often time-consuming, expensive, error-prone, and unsuitable for large-scale applications, highlighting the need for accurate and efficient automated systems. In this study, we evaluate several state-of-the-art CNN models, including ResNet, ResNeXt, DenseNet, and EfficientNet, using three transfer learning approaches: linear probing, fine-tuning, and a combined approach, to classify eleven harmful phytoplankton genera from microscopic images. The best performance was achieved by ResNet-50 using the fine-tuning approach, with an accuracy of 96.97%. The results also revealed that the models struggled to differentiate between four harmful phytoplankton types with similar morphological features.
title Recognition of Harmful Phytoplankton from Microscopic Images using Deep Learning
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12900