Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saunders, Adam M., Kim, Michael E., Gao, Chenyu, Remedios, Lucas W., Krishnan, Aravind R., Schilling, Kurt G., O'Grady, Kristin P., Smith, Seth A., Landman, Bennett A.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13145
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913642110255104
author Saunders, Adam M.
Kim, Michael E.
Gao, Chenyu
Remedios, Lucas W.
Krishnan, Aravind R.
Schilling, Kurt G.
O'Grady, Kristin P.
Smith, Seth A.
Landman, Bennett A.
author_facet Saunders, Adam M.
Kim, Michael E.
Gao, Chenyu
Remedios, Lucas W.
Krishnan, Aravind R.
Schilling, Kurt G.
O'Grady, Kristin P.
Smith, Seth A.
Landman, Bennett A.
contents While typical qualitative T1-weighted magnetic resonance images reflect scanner and protocol differences, quantitative T1 mapping aims to measure T1 independent of these effects. Changes in T1 in the brain reflect structural changes in brain tissue. Magnetization-prepared two rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) is an acquisition protocol that allows for efficient T1 mapping with a much lower scan time per slab compared to multi-TI inversion recovery (IR) protocols. We collect and register B1-corrected MP2RAGE acquisitions with an additional inversion time (MP3RAGE) alongside multi-TI selective inversion recovery acquisitions for four subjects. We use a maximum a posteriori (MAP) T1 estimation method for both MP2RAGE and compare to typical point estimate MP2RAGE T1 mapping, finding no bias from MAP MP2RAGE but a sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneities with MAP MP3RAGE. We demonstrate a tissue-dependent bias between MAP MP2RAGE T1 estimates and the multi-TI inversion recovery T1 values. To correct this bias, we train a patch-based ResNet-18 to calibrate the MAP MP2RAGE T1 estimates to the multi-TI IR T1 values. Across four folds, our network reduces the RMSE significantly (white matter: from 0.30 +/- 0.01 seconds to 0.11 +/- 0.02 seconds, subcortical gray matter: from 0.26 +/- 0.02 seconds to 0.10 +/- 0.02 seconds, cortical gray matter: from 0.36 +/- 0.02 seconds to 0.17 +/- 0.03 seconds). Using limited paired training data from both sequences, we can reduce the error between quantitative imaging methods and calibrate to one of the protocols with a neural network.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_13145
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparison and calibration of MP2RAGE quantitative T1 values to multi-TI inversion recovery T1 values
Saunders, Adam M.
Kim, Michael E.
Gao, Chenyu
Remedios, Lucas W.
Krishnan, Aravind R.
Schilling, Kurt G.
O'Grady, Kristin P.
Smith, Seth A.
Landman, Bennett A.
Image and Video Processing
While typical qualitative T1-weighted magnetic resonance images reflect scanner and protocol differences, quantitative T1 mapping aims to measure T1 independent of these effects. Changes in T1 in the brain reflect structural changes in brain tissue. Magnetization-prepared two rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) is an acquisition protocol that allows for efficient T1 mapping with a much lower scan time per slab compared to multi-TI inversion recovery (IR) protocols. We collect and register B1-corrected MP2RAGE acquisitions with an additional inversion time (MP3RAGE) alongside multi-TI selective inversion recovery acquisitions for four subjects. We use a maximum a posteriori (MAP) T1 estimation method for both MP2RAGE and compare to typical point estimate MP2RAGE T1 mapping, finding no bias from MAP MP2RAGE but a sensitivity to B1 inhomogeneities with MAP MP3RAGE. We demonstrate a tissue-dependent bias between MAP MP2RAGE T1 estimates and the multi-TI inversion recovery T1 values. To correct this bias, we train a patch-based ResNet-18 to calibrate the MAP MP2RAGE T1 estimates to the multi-TI IR T1 values. Across four folds, our network reduces the RMSE significantly (white matter: from 0.30 +/- 0.01 seconds to 0.11 +/- 0.02 seconds, subcortical gray matter: from 0.26 +/- 0.02 seconds to 0.10 +/- 0.02 seconds, cortical gray matter: from 0.36 +/- 0.02 seconds to 0.17 +/- 0.03 seconds). Using limited paired training data from both sequences, we can reduce the error between quantitative imaging methods and calibrate to one of the protocols with a neural network.
title Comparison and calibration of MP2RAGE quantitative T1 values to multi-TI inversion recovery T1 values
topic Image and Video Processing
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13145