Do Large Language Models have Problem-Solving Capability under Incomplete Information Scenarios?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866929509919358976 |
|---|---|
| author | Chen, Yuyan Yu, Tianhao Li, Yueze Yan, Songzhou Liu, Sijia Liang, Jiaqing Xiao, Yanghua |
| author_facet | Chen, Yuyan Yu, Tianhao Li, Yueze Yan, Songzhou Liu, Sijia Liang, Jiaqing Xiao, Yanghua |
| contents | The evaluation of the problem-solving capability under incomplete information scenarios of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly important, encompassing capabilities such as questioning, knowledge search, error detection, and path planning. Current research mainly focus on LLMs' problem-solving capability such as ``Twenty Questions''. However, these kinds of games do not require recognizing misleading cues which are necessary in the incomplete information scenario. Moreover, the existing game such as ``Who is undercover'' are highly subjective, making it challenging for evaluation. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce a novel game named BrainKing based on the ``Who is undercover'' and ``Twenty Questions'' for evaluating LLM capabilities under incomplete information scenarios. It requires LLMs to identify target entities with limited yes-or-no questions and potential misleading answers. By setting up easy, medium, and hard difficulty modes, we comprehensively assess the performance of LLMs across various aspects. Our results reveal the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in BrainKing, providing significant insights of LLM problem-solving levels. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_14762 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Large Language Models have Problem-Solving Capability under Incomplete Information Scenarios? Chen, Yuyan Yu, Tianhao Li, Yueze Yan, Songzhou Liu, Sijia Liang, Jiaqing Xiao, Yanghua Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence The evaluation of the problem-solving capability under incomplete information scenarios of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly important, encompassing capabilities such as questioning, knowledge search, error detection, and path planning. Current research mainly focus on LLMs' problem-solving capability such as ``Twenty Questions''. However, these kinds of games do not require recognizing misleading cues which are necessary in the incomplete information scenario. Moreover, the existing game such as ``Who is undercover'' are highly subjective, making it challenging for evaluation. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce a novel game named BrainKing based on the ``Who is undercover'' and ``Twenty Questions'' for evaluating LLM capabilities under incomplete information scenarios. It requires LLMs to identify target entities with limited yes-or-no questions and potential misleading answers. By setting up easy, medium, and hard difficulty modes, we comprehensively assess the performance of LLMs across various aspects. Our results reveal the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in BrainKing, providing significant insights of LLM problem-solving levels. |
| title | Do Large Language Models have Problem-Solving Capability under Incomplete Information Scenarios? |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14762 |