AIM 2024 Sparse Neural Rendering Challenge: Methods and Results

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Nazarczuk, Michal, Catley-Chandar, Sibi, Tanay, Thomas, Shaw, Richard, Pérez-Pellitero, Eduardo, Timofte, Radu, Yan, Xing, Wang, Pan, Guo, Yali, Wu, Yongxin, Cai, Youcheng, Yang, Yanan, Li, Junting, Zhou, Yanghong, Mok, P. Y., He, Zongqi, Xiao, Zhe, Chan, Kin-Chung, Goshu, Hana Lebeta, Yang, Cuixin, Dong, Rongkang, Xiao, Jun, Lam, Kin-Man, Hao, Jiayao, Gao, Qiong, Zu, Yanyan, Zhang, Junpei, Jiao, Licheng, Liu, Xu, Purohit, Kuldeep
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866929510867271680
author Nazarczuk, Michal
Catley-Chandar, Sibi
Tanay, Thomas
Shaw, Richard
Pérez-Pellitero, Eduardo
Timofte, Radu
Yan, Xing
Wang, Pan
Guo, Yali
Wu, Yongxin
Cai, Youcheng
Yang, Yanan
Li, Junting
Zhou, Yanghong
Mok, P. Y.
He, Zongqi
Xiao, Zhe
Chan, Kin-Chung
Goshu, Hana Lebeta
Yang, Cuixin
Dong, Rongkang
Xiao, Jun
Lam, Kin-Man
Hao, Jiayao
Gao, Qiong
Zu, Yanyan
Zhang, Junpei
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Xu
Purohit, Kuldeep
author_facet Nazarczuk, Michal
Catley-Chandar, Sibi
Tanay, Thomas
Shaw, Richard
Pérez-Pellitero, Eduardo
Timofte, Radu
Yan, Xing
Wang, Pan
Guo, Yali
Wu, Yongxin
Cai, Youcheng
Yang, Yanan
Li, Junting
Zhou, Yanghong
Mok, P. Y.
He, Zongqi
Xiao, Zhe
Chan, Kin-Chung
Goshu, Hana Lebeta
Yang, Cuixin
Dong, Rongkang
Xiao, Jun
Lam, Kin-Man
Hao, Jiayao
Gao, Qiong
Zu, Yanyan
Zhang, Junpei
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Xu
Purohit, Kuldeep
contents This paper reviews the challenge on Sparse Neural Rendering that was part of the Advances in Image Manipulation (AIM) workshop, held in conjunction with ECCV 2024. This manuscript focuses on the competition set-up, the proposed methods and their respective results. The challenge aims at producing novel camera view synthesis of diverse scenes from sparse image observations. It is composed of two tracks, with differing levels of sparsity; 3 views in Track 1 (very sparse) and 9 views in Track 2 (sparse). Participants are asked to optimise objective fidelity to the ground-truth images as measured via the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) metric. For both tracks, we use the newly introduced Sparse Rendering (SpaRe) dataset and the popular DTU MVS dataset. In this challenge, 5 teams submitted final results to Track 1 and 4 teams submitted final results to Track 2. The submitted models are varied and push the boundaries of the current state-of-the-art in sparse neural rendering. A detailed description of all models developed in the challenge is provided in this paper.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15045
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle AIM 2024 Sparse Neural Rendering Challenge: Methods and Results
Nazarczuk, Michal
Catley-Chandar, Sibi
Tanay, Thomas
Shaw, Richard
Pérez-Pellitero, Eduardo
Timofte, Radu
Yan, Xing
Wang, Pan
Guo, Yali
Wu, Yongxin
Cai, Youcheng
Yang, Yanan
Li, Junting
Zhou, Yanghong
Mok, P. Y.
He, Zongqi
Xiao, Zhe
Chan, Kin-Chung
Goshu, Hana Lebeta
Yang, Cuixin
Dong, Rongkang
Xiao, Jun
Lam, Kin-Man
Hao, Jiayao
Gao, Qiong
Zu, Yanyan
Zhang, Junpei
Jiao, Licheng
Liu, Xu
Purohit, Kuldeep
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
This paper reviews the challenge on Sparse Neural Rendering that was part of the Advances in Image Manipulation (AIM) workshop, held in conjunction with ECCV 2024. This manuscript focuses on the competition set-up, the proposed methods and their respective results. The challenge aims at producing novel camera view synthesis of diverse scenes from sparse image observations. It is composed of two tracks, with differing levels of sparsity; 3 views in Track 1 (very sparse) and 9 views in Track 2 (sparse). Participants are asked to optimise objective fidelity to the ground-truth images as measured via the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) metric. For both tracks, we use the newly introduced Sparse Rendering (SpaRe) dataset and the popular DTU MVS dataset. In this challenge, 5 teams submitted final results to Track 1 and 4 teams submitted final results to Track 2. The submitted models are varied and push the boundaries of the current state-of-the-art in sparse neural rendering. A detailed description of all models developed in the challenge is provided in this paper.
title AIM 2024 Sparse Neural Rendering Challenge: Methods and Results
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15045