Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15047 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909322995302400 |
|---|---|
| author | Che, Hao Jiang, Hong Wang, Zhijun |
| author_facet | Che, Hao Jiang, Hong Wang, Zhijun |
| contents | Recent years have witnessed the proposals aiming at enabling Vertical, two-sided markets with a Single Marketplace (or exchange) (VSMs) for computing and data resources/services (products) offerings in a multi-cloud and crowdsourced IoT-edge sensing environment. A VSM is designed vertically from bottom up with a broker being a built-in component of the marketplace. While preventing seller lock-in and improving efficiency and availability, a VSM suffers from a key weakness from a buyer's perspective, i.e., the broker and the corresponding marketplace lock-in, which may lead to suboptimal shopping experience for buyers, due to marketplace monopoly by the broker and limited choice of products in the marketplace. In this position paper, we argue that a Horizontal two-sided market with Multiple Marketplaces (HMM), resembling the global stock market, should be developed. In an HMM, different marketplaces may be operated by different parties and sell similar and/or different types of products, e.g., computing and/or sensory data products. A broker is no longer a built-in component of any given marketplace. Instead, it may cover multiple marketplaces at the same time and there can be more than one broker in the HMM. Both the number and types of marketplaces and brokers may grow independently or scale horizontally to meet the growing demand. A buyer shops for a broker through whom the buyer gains access to the needed products sold in the marketplace(s) the broker covers and from whom the buyer receives various possible services, e.g., discount, value-added, or full services. An HMM not only overcomes the key weakness of a VSM but also allows the market to grow incrementally and organically. Finally, two example use cases are given to illustrate the benefits of HMM. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15047 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Towards a General Market for Cloud-Edge-IoT Continuum Che, Hao Jiang, Hong Wang, Zhijun Systems and Control Recent years have witnessed the proposals aiming at enabling Vertical, two-sided markets with a Single Marketplace (or exchange) (VSMs) for computing and data resources/services (products) offerings in a multi-cloud and crowdsourced IoT-edge sensing environment. A VSM is designed vertically from bottom up with a broker being a built-in component of the marketplace. While preventing seller lock-in and improving efficiency and availability, a VSM suffers from a key weakness from a buyer's perspective, i.e., the broker and the corresponding marketplace lock-in, which may lead to suboptimal shopping experience for buyers, due to marketplace monopoly by the broker and limited choice of products in the marketplace. In this position paper, we argue that a Horizontal two-sided market with Multiple Marketplaces (HMM), resembling the global stock market, should be developed. In an HMM, different marketplaces may be operated by different parties and sell similar and/or different types of products, e.g., computing and/or sensory data products. A broker is no longer a built-in component of any given marketplace. Instead, it may cover multiple marketplaces at the same time and there can be more than one broker in the HMM. Both the number and types of marketplaces and brokers may grow independently or scale horizontally to meet the growing demand. A buyer shops for a broker through whom the buyer gains access to the needed products sold in the marketplace(s) the broker covers and from whom the buyer receives various possible services, e.g., discount, value-added, or full services. An HMM not only overcomes the key weakness of a VSM but also allows the market to grow incrementally and organically. Finally, two example use cases are given to illustrate the benefits of HMM. |
| title | Towards a General Market for Cloud-Edge-IoT Continuum |
| topic | Systems and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15047 |