Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qin, Honglin, Zheng, Hongye, Wang, Bingxing, Wu, Zhizhong, Liu, Bingyao, Yang, Yuanfang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15314
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917784054661120
author Qin, Honglin
Zheng, Hongye
Wang, Bingxing
Wu, Zhizhong
Liu, Bingyao
Yang, Yuanfang
author_facet Qin, Honglin
Zheng, Hongye
Wang, Bingxing
Wu, Zhizhong
Liu, Bingyao
Yang, Yuanfang
contents Currently, widely used first-order deep learning optimizers include non-adaptive learning rate optimizers and adaptive learning rate optimizers. The former is represented by SGDM (Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum), while the latter is represented by Adam. Both of these methods use exponential moving averages to estimate the overall gradient. However, estimating the overall gradient using exponential moving averages is biased and has a lag. This paper proposes an RSGDM algorithm based on differential correction. Our contributions are mainly threefold: 1) Analyze the bias and lag brought by the exponential moving average in the SGDM algorithm. 2) Use the differential estimation term to correct the bias and lag in the SGDM algorithm, proposing the RSGDM algorithm. 3) Experiments on the CIFAR datasets have proven that our RSGDM algorithm is superior to the SGDM algorithm in terms of convergence accuracy.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15314
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Reducing Bias in Deep Learning Optimization: The RSGDM Approach
Qin, Honglin
Zheng, Hongye
Wang, Bingxing
Wu, Zhizhong
Liu, Bingyao
Yang, Yuanfang
Machine Learning
Currently, widely used first-order deep learning optimizers include non-adaptive learning rate optimizers and adaptive learning rate optimizers. The former is represented by SGDM (Stochastic Gradient Descent with Momentum), while the latter is represented by Adam. Both of these methods use exponential moving averages to estimate the overall gradient. However, estimating the overall gradient using exponential moving averages is biased and has a lag. This paper proposes an RSGDM algorithm based on differential correction. Our contributions are mainly threefold: 1) Analyze the bias and lag brought by the exponential moving average in the SGDM algorithm. 2) Use the differential estimation term to correct the bias and lag in the SGDM algorithm, proposing the RSGDM algorithm. 3) Experiments on the CIFAR datasets have proven that our RSGDM algorithm is superior to the SGDM algorithm in terms of convergence accuracy.
title Reducing Bias in Deep Learning Optimization: The RSGDM Approach
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15314