Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang, Likun, Wu, Hao, Zhang, Lingcui, Xu, Fengyuan, Cao, Jin, Li, Fenghua, Niu, Ben
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15781
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917784520228864
author Zhang, Likun
Wu, Hao
Zhang, Lingcui
Xu, Fengyuan
Cao, Jin
Li, Fenghua
Niu, Ben
author_facet Zhang, Likun
Wu, Hao
Zhang, Lingcui
Xu, Fengyuan
Cao, Jin
Li, Fenghua
Niu, Ben
contents The emergence of text-to-image models has recently sparked significant interest, but the attendant is a looming shadow of potential infringement by violating the user terms. Specifically, an adversary may exploit data created by a commercial model to train their own without proper authorization. To address such risk, it is crucial to investigate the attribution of a suspicious model's training data by determining whether its training data originates, wholly or partially, from a specific source model. To trace the generated data, existing methods require applying extra watermarks during either the training or inference phases of the source model. However, these methods are impractical for pre-trained models that have been released, especially when model owners lack security expertise. To tackle this challenge, we propose an injection-free training data attribution method for text-to-image models. It can identify whether a suspicious model's training data stems from a source model, without additional modifications on the source model. The crux of our method lies in the inherent memorization characteristic of text-to-image models. Our core insight is that the memorization of the training dataset is passed down through the data generated by the source model to the model trained on that data, making the source model and the infringing model exhibit consistent behaviors on specific samples. Therefore, our approach involves developing algorithms to uncover these distinct samples and using them as inherent watermarks to verify if a suspicious model originates from the source model. Our experiments demonstrate that our method achieves an accuracy of over 80\% in identifying the source of a suspicious model's training data, without interfering the original training or generation process of the source model.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15781
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Training Data Attribution: Was Your Model Secretly Trained On Data Created By Mine?
Zhang, Likun
Wu, Hao
Zhang, Lingcui
Xu, Fengyuan
Cao, Jin
Li, Fenghua
Niu, Ben
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The emergence of text-to-image models has recently sparked significant interest, but the attendant is a looming shadow of potential infringement by violating the user terms. Specifically, an adversary may exploit data created by a commercial model to train their own without proper authorization. To address such risk, it is crucial to investigate the attribution of a suspicious model's training data by determining whether its training data originates, wholly or partially, from a specific source model. To trace the generated data, existing methods require applying extra watermarks during either the training or inference phases of the source model. However, these methods are impractical for pre-trained models that have been released, especially when model owners lack security expertise. To tackle this challenge, we propose an injection-free training data attribution method for text-to-image models. It can identify whether a suspicious model's training data stems from a source model, without additional modifications on the source model. The crux of our method lies in the inherent memorization characteristic of text-to-image models. Our core insight is that the memorization of the training dataset is passed down through the data generated by the source model to the model trained on that data, making the source model and the infringing model exhibit consistent behaviors on specific samples. Therefore, our approach involves developing algorithms to uncover these distinct samples and using them as inherent watermarks to verify if a suspicious model originates from the source model. Our experiments demonstrate that our method achieves an accuracy of over 80\% in identifying the source of a suspicious model's training data, without interfering the original training or generation process of the source model.
title Training Data Attribution: Was Your Model Secretly Trained On Data Created By Mine?
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15781