Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15828 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914039326572544 |
|---|---|
| author | de Jonge, Tim Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen |
| author_facet | de Jonge, Tim Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen |
| contents | In 2023, the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights, the Dutch non-discrimination authority, decided that Breeze, a Dutch dating app, was justified in suspecting that their algorithm discriminated against dark-skinned users. Consequently, the Institute decided that Breeze must prevent this discrimination based on ethnicity. This paper analyses the decision and explores three questions.What are the main points of the Breeze decision? Is the discrimination based on ethnicity in Breeze's matching algorithm illegal? We also explore a more general question: how can dating apps mitigate or stop discrimination in their matching algorithms? We illustrate the legal and technical difficulties dating apps face in tackling discrimination and highlight some promising solutions. We analyse the Breeze decision in-depth, combining insights from computer science and law. We discuss the implications of this judgment for scholarship and practice in the field of fair and non-discriminatory machine learning. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15828 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Digital Discrimination in Dating Apps and the Dutch Breeze case de Jonge, Tim Borgesius, Frederik Zuiderveen Computers and Society Information Retrieval In 2023, the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights, the Dutch non-discrimination authority, decided that Breeze, a Dutch dating app, was justified in suspecting that their algorithm discriminated against dark-skinned users. Consequently, the Institute decided that Breeze must prevent this discrimination based on ethnicity. This paper analyses the decision and explores three questions.What are the main points of the Breeze decision? Is the discrimination based on ethnicity in Breeze's matching algorithm illegal? We also explore a more general question: how can dating apps mitigate or stop discrimination in their matching algorithms? We illustrate the legal and technical difficulties dating apps face in tackling discrimination and highlight some promising solutions. We analyse the Breeze decision in-depth, combining insights from computer science and law. We discuss the implications of this judgment for scholarship and practice in the field of fair and non-discriminatory machine learning. |
| title | Digital Discrimination in Dating Apps and the Dutch Breeze case |
| topic | Computers and Society Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15828 |