Exploring the Impact of Outlier Variability on Anomaly Detection Evaluation Metrics
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866913514789011456 |
|---|---|
| author | Ok, Minjae Klüttermann, Simon Müller, Emmanuel |
| author_facet | Ok, Minjae Klüttermann, Simon Müller, Emmanuel |
| contents | Anomaly detection is a dynamic field, in which the evaluation of models plays a critical role in understanding their effectiveness. The selection and interpretation of the evaluation metrics are pivotal, particularly in scenarios with varying amounts of anomalies. This study focuses on examining the behaviors of three widely used anomaly detection metrics under different conditions: F1 score, Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC), and Precision-Recall Curve Area Under Curve (AUCPR). Our study critically analyzes the extent to which these metrics provide reliable and distinct insights into model performance, especially considering varying levels of outlier fractions and contamination thresholds in datasets.
Through a comprehensive experimental setup involving widely recognized algorithms for anomaly detection, we present findings that challenge the conventional understanding of these metrics and reveal nuanced behaviors under varying conditions. We demonstrated that while the F1 score and AUCPR are sensitive to outlier fractions, the ROC AUC maintains consistency and is unaffected by such variability. Additionally, under conditions of a fixed outlier fraction in the test set, we observe an alignment between ROC AUC and AUCPR, indicating that the choice between these two metrics may be less critical in such scenarios.
The results of our study contribute to a more refined understanding of metric selection and interpretation in anomaly detection, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_15986 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exploring the Impact of Outlier Variability on Anomaly Detection Evaluation Metrics Ok, Minjae Klüttermann, Simon Müller, Emmanuel Machine Learning Anomaly detection is a dynamic field, in which the evaluation of models plays a critical role in understanding their effectiveness. The selection and interpretation of the evaluation metrics are pivotal, particularly in scenarios with varying amounts of anomalies. This study focuses on examining the behaviors of three widely used anomaly detection metrics under different conditions: F1 score, Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under Curve (ROC AUC), and Precision-Recall Curve Area Under Curve (AUCPR). Our study critically analyzes the extent to which these metrics provide reliable and distinct insights into model performance, especially considering varying levels of outlier fractions and contamination thresholds in datasets. Through a comprehensive experimental setup involving widely recognized algorithms for anomaly detection, we present findings that challenge the conventional understanding of these metrics and reveal nuanced behaviors under varying conditions. We demonstrated that while the F1 score and AUCPR are sensitive to outlier fractions, the ROC AUC maintains consistency and is unaffected by such variability. Additionally, under conditions of a fixed outlier fraction in the test set, we observe an alignment between ROC AUC and AUCPR, indicating that the choice between these two metrics may be less critical in such scenarios. The results of our study contribute to a more refined understanding of metric selection and interpretation in anomaly detection, offering valuable insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field. |
| title | Exploring the Impact of Outlier Variability on Anomaly Detection Evaluation Metrics |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15986 |