Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gupta, Ritwik, Walker, Leah, Corona, Rodolfo, Fu, Stephanie, Petryk, Suzanne, Napolitano, Janet, Darrell, Trevor, Reddie, Andrew W.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17216
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917786946633728
author Gupta, Ritwik
Walker, Leah
Corona, Rodolfo
Fu, Stephanie
Petryk, Suzanne
Napolitano, Janet
Darrell, Trevor
Reddie, Andrew W.
author_facet Gupta, Ritwik
Walker, Leah
Corona, Rodolfo
Fu, Stephanie
Petryk, Suzanne
Napolitano, Janet
Darrell, Trevor
Reddie, Andrew W.
contents Current regulations on powerful AI capabilities are narrowly focused on "foundation" or "frontier" models. However, these terms are vague and inconsistently defined, leading to an unstable foundation for governance efforts. Critically, policy debates often fail to consider the data used with these models, despite the clear link between data and model performance. Even (relatively) "small" models that fall outside the typical definitions of foundation and frontier models can achieve equivalent outcomes when exposed to sufficiently specific datasets. In this work, we illustrate the importance of considering dataset size and content as essential factors in assessing the risks posed by models both today and in the future. More broadly, we emphasize the risk posed by over-regulating reactively and provide a path towards careful, quantitative evaluation of capabilities that can lead to a simplified regulatory environment.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_17216
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Data-Centric AI Governance: Addressing the Limitations of Model-Focused Policies
Gupta, Ritwik
Walker, Leah
Corona, Rodolfo
Fu, Stephanie
Petryk, Suzanne
Napolitano, Janet
Darrell, Trevor
Reddie, Andrew W.
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Current regulations on powerful AI capabilities are narrowly focused on "foundation" or "frontier" models. However, these terms are vague and inconsistently defined, leading to an unstable foundation for governance efforts. Critically, policy debates often fail to consider the data used with these models, despite the clear link between data and model performance. Even (relatively) "small" models that fall outside the typical definitions of foundation and frontier models can achieve equivalent outcomes when exposed to sufficiently specific datasets. In this work, we illustrate the importance of considering dataset size and content as essential factors in assessing the risks posed by models both today and in the future. More broadly, we emphasize the risk posed by over-regulating reactively and provide a path towards careful, quantitative evaluation of capabilities that can lead to a simplified regulatory environment.
title Data-Centric AI Governance: Addressing the Limitations of Model-Focused Policies
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17216