Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reddy, Abbavaram Gowtham, Balasubramanian, Vineeth N
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910621154410496
author Reddy, Abbavaram Gowtham
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N
author_facet Reddy, Abbavaram Gowtham
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N
contents Detecting and measuring confounding effects from data is a key challenge in causal inference. Existing methods frequently assume causal sufficiency, disregarding the presence of unobserved confounding variables. Causal sufficiency is both unrealistic and empirically untestable. Additionally, existing methods make strong parametric assumptions about the underlying causal generative process to guarantee the identifiability of confounding variables. Relaxing the causal sufficiency and parametric assumptions and leveraging recent advancements in causal discovery and confounding analysis with non-i.i.d. data, we propose a comprehensive approach for detecting and measuring confounding. We consider various definitions of confounding and introduce tailored methodologies to achieve three objectives: (i) detecting and measuring confounding among a set of variables, (ii) separating observed and unobserved confounding effects, and (iii) understanding the relative strengths of confounding bias between different sets of variables. We present useful properties of a confounding measure and present measures that satisfy those properties. Empirical results support the theoretical analysis.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_17840
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts
Reddy, Abbavaram Gowtham
Balasubramanian, Vineeth N
Artificial Intelligence
Detecting and measuring confounding effects from data is a key challenge in causal inference. Existing methods frequently assume causal sufficiency, disregarding the presence of unobserved confounding variables. Causal sufficiency is both unrealistic and empirically untestable. Additionally, existing methods make strong parametric assumptions about the underlying causal generative process to guarantee the identifiability of confounding variables. Relaxing the causal sufficiency and parametric assumptions and leveraging recent advancements in causal discovery and confounding analysis with non-i.i.d. data, we propose a comprehensive approach for detecting and measuring confounding. We consider various definitions of confounding and introduce tailored methodologies to achieve three objectives: (i) detecting and measuring confounding among a set of variables, (ii) separating observed and unobserved confounding effects, and (iii) understanding the relative strengths of confounding bias between different sets of variables. We present useful properties of a confounding measure and present measures that satisfy those properties. Empirical results support the theoretical analysis.
title Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17840