Academic Knowledge: Does it Reflect the Combinatorial Growth of Technology?
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866929521865785344 |
|---|---|
| author | Schmal, W. Benedikt |
| author_facet | Schmal, W. Benedikt |
| contents | I explore the concept of growth being rooted in the recombination of existing technology as an explanation for the remarkable growth witnessed during the Industrial Revolution as it was recently proposed by Koppl et al.(2023). I adapt their combinatorial growth theory to assess its applicability in generating academic knowledge within universities and research institutions, particularly in the field of economics. The central question is whether significant combinatorial growth can also be anticipated in academia. The current career structures discourage the recombination of ideas, theories, or methods, making it more advantageous for early career researchers to stick to the status quo. I employ machine-learning-based natural language analysis of the top 5 journals in economics. The analysis reveals limited correlations between topics over the past three decades, suggesting the presence of isolated topic islands rather than productive recombination. This confirms the theoretical considerations beforehand. Overall, the institutional order of academia makes combinatorial growth at the research frontier unlikely. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_20282 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Academic Knowledge: Does it Reflect the Combinatorial Growth of Technology? Schmal, W. Benedikt General Economics Economics I explore the concept of growth being rooted in the recombination of existing technology as an explanation for the remarkable growth witnessed during the Industrial Revolution as it was recently proposed by Koppl et al.(2023). I adapt their combinatorial growth theory to assess its applicability in generating academic knowledge within universities and research institutions, particularly in the field of economics. The central question is whether significant combinatorial growth can also be anticipated in academia. The current career structures discourage the recombination of ideas, theories, or methods, making it more advantageous for early career researchers to stick to the status quo. I employ machine-learning-based natural language analysis of the top 5 journals in economics. The analysis reveals limited correlations between topics over the past three decades, suggesting the presence of isolated topic islands rather than productive recombination. This confirms the theoretical considerations beforehand. Overall, the institutional order of academia makes combinatorial growth at the research frontier unlikely. |
| title | Academic Knowledge: Does it Reflect the Combinatorial Growth of Technology? |
| topic | General Economics Economics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20282 |