Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20511 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917887479906304 |
|---|---|
| author | Piansky, Ryan Taylor, Sofia Rhodes, Noah Molzahn, Daniel K. Roald, Line A. Watson, Jean-Paul |
| author_facet | Piansky, Ryan Taylor, Sofia Rhodes, Noah Molzahn, Daniel K. Roald, Line A. Watson, Jean-Paul |
| contents | Faults on power lines and other electric equipment are known to cause wildfire ignitions. To mitigate the threat of wildfire ignitions from electric power infrastructure, many utilities preemptively de-energize power lines, which may result in power shutoffs. Data regarding wildfire ignition risks are key inputs for effective planning of power line de-energizations. However, there are multiple ways to formulate risk metrics that spatially aggregate wildfire risk map data, and there are different ways of leveraging this data to make decisions. The key contribution of this paper is to define and compare the results of employing six metrics for quantifying the wildfire ignition risks of power lines from risk maps, considering both threshold- and optimization-based methods for planning power line de-energizations. The numeric results use the California Test System (CATS), a large-scale synthetic grid model with power line corridors accurately representing California infrastructure, in combination with real Wildland Fire Potential Index data for a full year. This is the first application of optimal power shutoff planning on such a large and realistic test case. Our results show that the choice of risk metric significantly impacts the lines that are de-energized and the resulting load shed. We find that the optimization-based method results in significantly less load shed than the threshold-based method while achieving the same risk reduction. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2409_20511 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantifying Metrics for Wildfire Ignition Risk from Geographic Data in Power Shutoff Decision-Making Piansky, Ryan Taylor, Sofia Rhodes, Noah Molzahn, Daniel K. Roald, Line A. Watson, Jean-Paul Systems and Control Faults on power lines and other electric equipment are known to cause wildfire ignitions. To mitigate the threat of wildfire ignitions from electric power infrastructure, many utilities preemptively de-energize power lines, which may result in power shutoffs. Data regarding wildfire ignition risks are key inputs for effective planning of power line de-energizations. However, there are multiple ways to formulate risk metrics that spatially aggregate wildfire risk map data, and there are different ways of leveraging this data to make decisions. The key contribution of this paper is to define and compare the results of employing six metrics for quantifying the wildfire ignition risks of power lines from risk maps, considering both threshold- and optimization-based methods for planning power line de-energizations. The numeric results use the California Test System (CATS), a large-scale synthetic grid model with power line corridors accurately representing California infrastructure, in combination with real Wildland Fire Potential Index data for a full year. This is the first application of optimal power shutoff planning on such a large and realistic test case. Our results show that the choice of risk metric significantly impacts the lines that are de-energized and the resulting load shed. We find that the optimization-based method results in significantly less load shed than the threshold-based method while achieving the same risk reduction. |
| title | Quantifying Metrics for Wildfire Ignition Risk from Geographic Data in Power Shutoff Decision-Making |
| topic | Systems and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.20511 |