Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03015 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917793935392768 |
|---|---|
| author | Augustino, Brandon Cain, Madelyn Farhi, Edward Gupta, Swati Gutmann, Sam Ranard, Daniel Tang, Eugene Van Kirk, Katherine |
| author_facet | Augustino, Brandon Cain, Madelyn Farhi, Edward Gupta, Swati Gutmann, Sam Ranard, Daniel Tang, Eugene Van Kirk, Katherine |
| contents | We explore strategies aimed at reducing the amount of computation, both quantum and classical, required to run the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). First, following Wurtz et al. [Phys.Rev A 104:052419], we consider the standard QAOA with instance-independent "tree" parameters chosen in advance. These tree parameters are chosen to optimize the MaxCut expectation for large girth graphs. We provide extensive numerical evidence supporting the performance guarantee for tree parameters conjectured in [Phys.Rev A 103:042612] and see that the approximation ratios obtained with tree parameters are typically well beyond the conjectured lower bounds, often comparable to performing a full optimization. This suggests that in practice, the QAOA can achieve near-optimal performance without the need for parameter optimization.
Next, we modify the warm-start QAOA of Tate et al. [Quantum 7:1121]. The starting state for the QAOA is now an optimized product state associated with a solution of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm. Surprisingly, the tree parameters continue to perform well for the warm-start QAOA. We find that for random 3-regular graphs with hundreds of vertices, the expected cut obtained by the warm-start QAOA at depth $p \gtrsim 3$ is comparable to that of the standard GW algorithm.
Our numerics on random instances do not provide general performance guarantees but do provide substantial evidence that there exists a regime of instance sizes in which the QAOA finds good solutions at low depth without the need for parameter optimization. For each instance studied, we classically compute the expected size of the QAOA distribution of cuts; producing the actual cuts requires running on a quantum computer. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_03015 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Strategies for running the QAOA at hundreds of qubits Augustino, Brandon Cain, Madelyn Farhi, Edward Gupta, Swati Gutmann, Sam Ranard, Daniel Tang, Eugene Van Kirk, Katherine Quantum Physics We explore strategies aimed at reducing the amount of computation, both quantum and classical, required to run the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). First, following Wurtz et al. [Phys.Rev A 104:052419], we consider the standard QAOA with instance-independent "tree" parameters chosen in advance. These tree parameters are chosen to optimize the MaxCut expectation for large girth graphs. We provide extensive numerical evidence supporting the performance guarantee for tree parameters conjectured in [Phys.Rev A 103:042612] and see that the approximation ratios obtained with tree parameters are typically well beyond the conjectured lower bounds, often comparable to performing a full optimization. This suggests that in practice, the QAOA can achieve near-optimal performance without the need for parameter optimization. Next, we modify the warm-start QAOA of Tate et al. [Quantum 7:1121]. The starting state for the QAOA is now an optimized product state associated with a solution of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm. Surprisingly, the tree parameters continue to perform well for the warm-start QAOA. We find that for random 3-regular graphs with hundreds of vertices, the expected cut obtained by the warm-start QAOA at depth $p \gtrsim 3$ is comparable to that of the standard GW algorithm. Our numerics on random instances do not provide general performance guarantees but do provide substantial evidence that there exists a regime of instance sizes in which the QAOA finds good solutions at low depth without the need for parameter optimization. For each instance studied, we classically compute the expected size of the QAOA distribution of cuts; producing the actual cuts requires running on a quantum computer. |
| title | Strategies for running the QAOA at hundreds of qubits |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03015 |