Reply to "Comment on "Reconsidering the nonlinear emergent inductance: time-varying Joule heating and its impact on the AC electrical response"" by Yokouch et al
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908345058721792 |
|---|---|
| author | Furuta, Soju Koshibae, Wataru Arima, Taka-hisa Kagawa, Fumitaka |
| author_facet | Furuta, Soju Koshibae, Wataru Arima, Taka-hisa Kagawa, Fumitaka |
| contents | This is a response to the comments [arXiv:2407.15682 and Phys.Rev.B 111, 146401 (2025)] by Yokouchi et al. on our paper in Phys.Rev.B 110, 174402 (2024). In this Reply, we note that (i) their arguments lack a discussion of whether the overall characteristics of the observed nonlinear impedance, including its magnitude and unphysical negative inductance interpretation, can be explained by the emergent induction scenario, whereas the Joule heating model can, (ii) they incorrectly refer to the Joule heating model, and (iii) their new data in the Comment are also quantitatively explained by the Joule heating model. These findings suggest that, contrary to the opinion by Yokouchi et al., the overall behavior of the observed impedance is irrelevant to emergent induction. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_04325 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Reply to "Comment on "Reconsidering the nonlinear emergent inductance: time-varying Joule heating and its impact on the AC electrical response"" by Yokouch et al Furuta, Soju Koshibae, Wataru Arima, Taka-hisa Kagawa, Fumitaka Materials Science This is a response to the comments [arXiv:2407.15682 and Phys.Rev.B 111, 146401 (2025)] by Yokouchi et al. on our paper in Phys.Rev.B 110, 174402 (2024). In this Reply, we note that (i) their arguments lack a discussion of whether the overall characteristics of the observed nonlinear impedance, including its magnitude and unphysical negative inductance interpretation, can be explained by the emergent induction scenario, whereas the Joule heating model can, (ii) they incorrectly refer to the Joule heating model, and (iii) their new data in the Comment are also quantitatively explained by the Joule heating model. These findings suggest that, contrary to the opinion by Yokouchi et al., the overall behavior of the observed impedance is irrelevant to emergent induction. |
| title | Reply to "Comment on "Reconsidering the nonlinear emergent inductance: time-varying Joule heating and its impact on the AC electrical response"" by Yokouch et al |
| topic | Materials Science |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04325 |