From Perception to Decision: Assessing the Role of Chart Types Affordances in High-Level Decision Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Li, Yixuan, Berger, Emery D., Kahng, Minsuk, Bearfield, Cindy Xiong
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912365354680320
author Li, Yixuan
Berger, Emery D.
Kahng, Minsuk
Bearfield, Cindy Xiong
author_facet Li, Yixuan
Berger, Emery D.
Kahng, Minsuk
Bearfield, Cindy Xiong
contents Visualization design influences how people perceive data patterns, yet most research focuses on low-level analytic tasks, such as finding correlations. The extent to which these perceptual affordances translate to high-level decision-making in the real world remains underexplored. Through a case study of academic mentorship selection using bar charts and pie charts, we investigated whether chart types differentially influence how students evaluate faculty research profiles. Our crowdsourced experiment revealed only minimal differences in decision outcomes between chart types, suggesting that perceptual affordances established in controlled analytical tasks may not directly translate to high-level decision scenarios. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating visualizations within real-world contexts and highlight the need to distinguish between perceptual and decision affordances when developing visualization guidelines.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_04686
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Perception to Decision: Assessing the Role of Chart Types Affordances in High-Level Decision Tasks
Li, Yixuan
Berger, Emery D.
Kahng, Minsuk
Bearfield, Cindy Xiong
Human-Computer Interaction
Visualization design influences how people perceive data patterns, yet most research focuses on low-level analytic tasks, such as finding correlations. The extent to which these perceptual affordances translate to high-level decision-making in the real world remains underexplored. Through a case study of academic mentorship selection using bar charts and pie charts, we investigated whether chart types differentially influence how students evaluate faculty research profiles. Our crowdsourced experiment revealed only minimal differences in decision outcomes between chart types, suggesting that perceptual affordances established in controlled analytical tasks may not directly translate to high-level decision scenarios. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating visualizations within real-world contexts and highlight the need to distinguish between perceptual and decision affordances when developing visualization guidelines.
title From Perception to Decision: Assessing the Role of Chart Types Affordances in High-Level Decision Tasks
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04686