Exploring the Landscape of Distributed Graph Sketching
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912120128405504 |
|---|---|
| author | Tench, David West, Evan T. Zhang, Kenny Bender, Michael DeLayo, Daniel Farach-Colton, Martin Gill, Gilvir Seip, Tyler Zhang, Victor |
| author_facet | Tench, David West, Evan T. Zhang, Kenny Bender, Michael DeLayo, Daniel Farach-Colton, Martin Gill, Gilvir Seip, Tyler Zhang, Victor |
| contents | Recent work has initiated the study of dense graph processing using graph sketching methods, which drastically reduce space costs by lossily compressing information about the input graph. In this paper, we explore the strange and surprising performance landscape of sketching algorithms. We highlight both their surprising advantages for processing dense graphs that were previously prohibitively expensive to study, as well as the current limitations of the technique. Most notably, we show how sketching can avoid bottlenecks that limit conventional graph processing methods.
Single-machine streaming graph processing systems are typically bottlenecked by CPU performance, and distributed graph processing systems are typically bottlenecked by network latency. We present Landscape, a distributed graph-stream processing system that uses linear sketching to distribute the CPU work of computing graph properties to distributed workers with no need for worker-to-worker communication. As a result, it overcomes the CPU and network bottlenecks that limit other systems. In fact, for the connected components problem, Landscape achieves a stream ingestion rate one-fourth that of maximum sustained RAM bandwidth, and is four times faster than random access RAM bandwidth. Additionally, we prove that for any sequence of graph updates and queries Landscape consumes at most a constant factor more network bandwidth than is required to receive the input stream. We show that this system can ingest up to 332 million stream updates per second on a graph with $2^{17}$ vertices. We show that it scales well with more distributed compute power: given a cluster of 40 distributed worker machines, it can ingest updates 35 times as fast as with 1 distributed worker machine. Landscape uses heuristics to reduce its query latency by up to four orders of magnitude over the prior state of the art. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_07518 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exploring the Landscape of Distributed Graph Sketching Tench, David West, Evan T. Zhang, Kenny Bender, Michael DeLayo, Daniel Farach-Colton, Martin Gill, Gilvir Seip, Tyler Zhang, Victor Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Recent work has initiated the study of dense graph processing using graph sketching methods, which drastically reduce space costs by lossily compressing information about the input graph. In this paper, we explore the strange and surprising performance landscape of sketching algorithms. We highlight both their surprising advantages for processing dense graphs that were previously prohibitively expensive to study, as well as the current limitations of the technique. Most notably, we show how sketching can avoid bottlenecks that limit conventional graph processing methods. Single-machine streaming graph processing systems are typically bottlenecked by CPU performance, and distributed graph processing systems are typically bottlenecked by network latency. We present Landscape, a distributed graph-stream processing system that uses linear sketching to distribute the CPU work of computing graph properties to distributed workers with no need for worker-to-worker communication. As a result, it overcomes the CPU and network bottlenecks that limit other systems. In fact, for the connected components problem, Landscape achieves a stream ingestion rate one-fourth that of maximum sustained RAM bandwidth, and is four times faster than random access RAM bandwidth. Additionally, we prove that for any sequence of graph updates and queries Landscape consumes at most a constant factor more network bandwidth than is required to receive the input stream. We show that this system can ingest up to 332 million stream updates per second on a graph with $2^{17}$ vertices. We show that it scales well with more distributed compute power: given a cluster of 40 distributed worker machines, it can ingest updates 35 times as fast as with 1 distributed worker machine. Landscape uses heuristics to reduce its query latency by up to four orders of magnitude over the prior state of the art. |
| title | Exploring the Landscape of Distributed Graph Sketching |
| topic | Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07518 |