Stackelberg vs. Nash in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, Yan, Ni, Bonan, Shen, Weiran, Wang, Zihe, Zhang, Jie
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918015394643968
author Liu, Yan
Ni, Bonan
Shen, Weiran
Wang, Zihe
Zhang, Jie
author_facet Liu, Yan
Ni, Bonan
Shen, Weiran
Wang, Zihe
Zhang, Jie
contents Resource competition problems are often modeled using Colonel Blotto games, where players take simultaneous actions. However, many real-world scenarios involve sequential decision-making rather than simultaneous moves. To model these dynamics, we represent the Lottery Colonel Blotto game as a Stackelberg game, in which one player, the leader, commits to a strategy first, and the other player, the follower, responds. We derive the Stackelberg equilibrium for this game, formulating the leader's strategy as a bi-level optimization problem. To solve this, we develop a constructive method based on iterative game reductions, which allows us to efficiently compute the leader's optimal commitment strategy in polynomial time. Additionally, we identify the conditions under which the Stackelberg equilibrium coincides with the Nash equilibrium. Specifically, this occurs when the budget ratio between the leader and the follower equals a certain threshold, which we can calculate in closed form. In some instances, we observe that when the leader's budget exceeds this threshold, both players achieve higher utilities in the Stackelberg equilibrium compared to the Nash equilibrium. Lastly, we show that, in the best case, the leader can achieve an infinite utility improvement by making an optimal first move compared to the Nash equilibrium.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_07690
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Stackelberg vs. Nash in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game
Liu, Yan
Ni, Bonan
Shen, Weiran
Wang, Zihe
Zhang, Jie
Computer Science and Game Theory
Resource competition problems are often modeled using Colonel Blotto games, where players take simultaneous actions. However, many real-world scenarios involve sequential decision-making rather than simultaneous moves. To model these dynamics, we represent the Lottery Colonel Blotto game as a Stackelberg game, in which one player, the leader, commits to a strategy first, and the other player, the follower, responds. We derive the Stackelberg equilibrium for this game, formulating the leader's strategy as a bi-level optimization problem. To solve this, we develop a constructive method based on iterative game reductions, which allows us to efficiently compute the leader's optimal commitment strategy in polynomial time. Additionally, we identify the conditions under which the Stackelberg equilibrium coincides with the Nash equilibrium. Specifically, this occurs when the budget ratio between the leader and the follower equals a certain threshold, which we can calculate in closed form. In some instances, we observe that when the leader's budget exceeds this threshold, both players achieve higher utilities in the Stackelberg equilibrium compared to the Nash equilibrium. Lastly, we show that, in the best case, the leader can achieve an infinite utility improvement by making an optimal first move compared to the Nash equilibrium.
title Stackelberg vs. Nash in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game
topic Computer Science and Game Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07690