Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08388 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916950233317376 |
|---|---|
| author | Powers, Maximus Raza, Shaina Chang, Alex Riaz, Rehana Mavani, Umang Jonala, Harshitha Reddy Tiwari, Ansh Wei, Hua |
| author_facet | Powers, Maximus Raza, Shaina Chang, Alex Riaz, Rehana Mavani, Umang Jonala, Harshitha Reddy Tiwari, Ansh Wei, Hua |
| contents | Representational harms in language technologies often occur in short spans within otherwise neutral text, where phrases may simultaneously convey generalizations, unfairness, or stereotypes. Framing bias detection as sentence-level classification obscures which words carry bias and what type is present, limiting both auditability and targeted mitigation. We introduce the GUS-Net Framework, comprising the GUS dataset and a multi-label token-level detector for span-level analysis of social bias. The GUS dataset contains 3,739 unique snippets across multiple domains, with over 69,000 token-level annotations. Each token is labeled using BIO tags (Begin, Inside, Outside) for three pathways of representational harm: Generalizations, Unfairness, and Stereotypes. To ensure reliable data annotation, we employ an automated multi-agent pipeline that proposes candidate spans which are subsequently verified and corrected by human experts. We formulate bias detection as multi-label token-level classification and benchmark both encoder-based models (e.g., BERT family variants) and decoder-based large language models (LLMs). Our evaluations cover token-level identification and span-level entity recognition on our test set, and out-of-distribution generalization. Empirical results show that encoder-based models consistently outperform decoder-based baselines on nuanced and overlapping spans while being more computationally efficient. The framework delivers interpretable, fine-grained diagnostics that enable systematic auditing and mitigation of representational harms in real-world NLP systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_08388 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Responsible AI in NLP: GUS-Net Span-Level Bias Detection Dataset and Benchmark for Generalizations, Unfairness, and Stereotypes Powers, Maximus Raza, Shaina Chang, Alex Riaz, Rehana Mavani, Umang Jonala, Harshitha Reddy Tiwari, Ansh Wei, Hua Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence Representational harms in language technologies often occur in short spans within otherwise neutral text, where phrases may simultaneously convey generalizations, unfairness, or stereotypes. Framing bias detection as sentence-level classification obscures which words carry bias and what type is present, limiting both auditability and targeted mitigation. We introduce the GUS-Net Framework, comprising the GUS dataset and a multi-label token-level detector for span-level analysis of social bias. The GUS dataset contains 3,739 unique snippets across multiple domains, with over 69,000 token-level annotations. Each token is labeled using BIO tags (Begin, Inside, Outside) for three pathways of representational harm: Generalizations, Unfairness, and Stereotypes. To ensure reliable data annotation, we employ an automated multi-agent pipeline that proposes candidate spans which are subsequently verified and corrected by human experts. We formulate bias detection as multi-label token-level classification and benchmark both encoder-based models (e.g., BERT family variants) and decoder-based large language models (LLMs). Our evaluations cover token-level identification and span-level entity recognition on our test set, and out-of-distribution generalization. Empirical results show that encoder-based models consistently outperform decoder-based baselines on nuanced and overlapping spans while being more computationally efficient. The framework delivers interpretable, fine-grained diagnostics that enable systematic auditing and mitigation of representational harms in real-world NLP systems. |
| title | Responsible AI in NLP: GUS-Net Span-Level Bias Detection Dataset and Benchmark for Generalizations, Unfairness, and Stereotypes |
| topic | Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08388 |