Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Lin, Fangru, Mao, Shaoguang, La Malfa, Emanuele, Hofmann, Valentin, de Wynter, Adrian, Wang, Xun, Chen, Si-Qing, Wooldridge, Michael, Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Wei, Furu
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908398151270400
author Lin, Fangru
Mao, Shaoguang
La Malfa, Emanuele
Hofmann, Valentin
de Wynter, Adrian
Wang, Xun
Chen, Si-Qing
Wooldridge, Michael
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
Wei, Furu
author_facet Lin, Fangru
Mao, Shaoguang
La Malfa, Emanuele
Hofmann, Valentin
de Wynter, Adrian
Wang, Xun
Chen, Si-Qing
Wooldridge, Michael
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
Wei, Furu
contents Language is not monolithic. While benchmarks, including those designed for multiple languages, are often used as proxies to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), they tend to overlook the nuances of within-language variation and thus fail to model the experience of speakers of non-standard dialects. Focusing on African American Vernacular English (AAVE), we present the first study aimed at objectively assessing the fairness and robustness of LLMs in handling dialects across canonical reasoning tasks, including algorithm, math, logic, and integrated reasoning. We introduce ReDial (Reasoning with Dialect Queries), a benchmark containing 1.2K+ parallel query pairs in Standardized English and AAVE. We hire AAVE speakers, including experts with computer science backgrounds, to rewrite seven popular benchmarks, such as HumanEval and GSM8K. With ReDial, we evaluate widely used LLMs, including GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and the Phi model families. Our findings reveal that almost all of these widely used models show significant brittleness and unfairness to queries in AAVE. Our work establishes a systematic and objective framework for analyzing LLM bias in dialectal queries. Moreover, it highlights how mainstream LLMs provide unfair service to dialect speakers in reasoning tasks, laying a critical foundation for future research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_11005
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks
Lin, Fangru
Mao, Shaoguang
La Malfa, Emanuele
Hofmann, Valentin
de Wynter, Adrian
Wang, Xun
Chen, Si-Qing
Wooldridge, Michael
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
Wei, Furu
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Language is not monolithic. While benchmarks, including those designed for multiple languages, are often used as proxies to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), they tend to overlook the nuances of within-language variation and thus fail to model the experience of speakers of non-standard dialects. Focusing on African American Vernacular English (AAVE), we present the first study aimed at objectively assessing the fairness and robustness of LLMs in handling dialects across canonical reasoning tasks, including algorithm, math, logic, and integrated reasoning. We introduce ReDial (Reasoning with Dialect Queries), a benchmark containing 1.2K+ parallel query pairs in Standardized English and AAVE. We hire AAVE speakers, including experts with computer science backgrounds, to rewrite seven popular benchmarks, such as HumanEval and GSM8K. With ReDial, we evaluate widely used LLMs, including GPT, Claude, Llama, Mistral, and the Phi model families. Our findings reveal that almost all of these widely used models show significant brittleness and unfairness to queries in AAVE. Our work establishes a systematic and objective framework for analyzing LLM bias in dialectal queries. Moreover, it highlights how mainstream LLMs provide unfair service to dialect speakers in reasoning tasks, laying a critical foundation for future research.
title Assessing Dialect Fairness and Robustness of Large Language Models in Reasoning Tasks
topic Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11005