Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11131 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914972965011456 |
|---|---|
| author | Erba, Alessandro Castellanos, John H. Sihag, Sahil Zonouz, Saman Tippenhauer, Nils Ole |
| author_facet | Erba, Alessandro Castellanos, John H. Sihag, Sahil Zonouz, Saman Tippenhauer, Nils Ole |
| contents | Unmanned Aerial Vehicles autonomously perform tasks with the use of state-of-the-art control algorithms. These control algorithms rely on the freshness and correctness of sensor readings. Incorrect control actions lead to catastrophic destabilization of the process.
In this work, we propose a multi-part \emph{Sensor Deprivation Attacks} (SDAs), aiming to stealthily impact process control via sensor reconfiguration. In the first part, the attacker will inject messages on local buses that connect to the sensor. The injected message reconfigures the sensors, e.g.,~to suspend the sensing. In the second part, those manipulation primitives are selectively used to cause adversarial sensor values at the controller, transparently to the data consumer. In the third part, the manipulated sensor values lead to unwanted control actions (e.g. a drone crash). We experimentally investigate all three parts of our proposed attack. Our findings show that i)~reconfiguring sensors can have surprising effects on reported sensor values, and ii)~the attacker can stall the overall Kalman Filter state estimation, leading to a complete stop of control computations. As a result, the UAV becomes destabilized, leading to a crash or significant deviation from its planned trajectory (over 30 meters). We also propose an attack synthesis methodology that optimizes the timing of these SDA manipulations, maximizing their impact. Notably, our results demonstrate that these SDAs evade detection by state-of-the-art UAV anomaly detectors.
Our work shows that attacks on sensors are not limited to continuously inducing random measurements, and demonstrate that sensor reconfiguration can completely stall the drone controller. In our experiments, state-of-the-art UAV controller software and countermeasures are unable to handle such manipulations. Hence, we also discuss new corresponding countermeasures. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_11131 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Sensor Deprivation Attacks for Stealthy UAV Manipulation Erba, Alessandro Castellanos, John H. Sihag, Sahil Zonouz, Saman Tippenhauer, Nils Ole Cryptography and Security Unmanned Aerial Vehicles autonomously perform tasks with the use of state-of-the-art control algorithms. These control algorithms rely on the freshness and correctness of sensor readings. Incorrect control actions lead to catastrophic destabilization of the process. In this work, we propose a multi-part \emph{Sensor Deprivation Attacks} (SDAs), aiming to stealthily impact process control via sensor reconfiguration. In the first part, the attacker will inject messages on local buses that connect to the sensor. The injected message reconfigures the sensors, e.g.,~to suspend the sensing. In the second part, those manipulation primitives are selectively used to cause adversarial sensor values at the controller, transparently to the data consumer. In the third part, the manipulated sensor values lead to unwanted control actions (e.g. a drone crash). We experimentally investigate all three parts of our proposed attack. Our findings show that i)~reconfiguring sensors can have surprising effects on reported sensor values, and ii)~the attacker can stall the overall Kalman Filter state estimation, leading to a complete stop of control computations. As a result, the UAV becomes destabilized, leading to a crash or significant deviation from its planned trajectory (over 30 meters). We also propose an attack synthesis methodology that optimizes the timing of these SDA manipulations, maximizing their impact. Notably, our results demonstrate that these SDAs evade detection by state-of-the-art UAV anomaly detectors. Our work shows that attacks on sensors are not limited to continuously inducing random measurements, and demonstrate that sensor reconfiguration can completely stall the drone controller. In our experiments, state-of-the-art UAV controller software and countermeasures are unable to handle such manipulations. Hence, we also discuss new corresponding countermeasures. |
| title | Sensor Deprivation Attacks for Stealthy UAV Manipulation |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11131 |