_version_ 1866909484795822080
author Idnay, Betina
Xu, Zihan
Adams, William G.
Adibuzzaman, Mohammad
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Bahroos, Neil
Bell, Douglas S.
Bumgardner, Cody
Campion, Thomas
Castro, Mario
Cimino, James J.
Cohen, I. Glenn
Dorr, David
Elkin, Peter L
Fan, Jungwei W.
Ferris, Todd
Foran, David J.
Hanauer, David
Hogarth, Mike
Huang, Kun
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
Kandpal, Manoj
Karnik, Niranjan S.
Katoch, Avnish
Lai, Albert M.
Lambert, Christophe G.
Li, Lang
Lindsell, Christopher
Liu, Jinze
Lu, Zhiyong
Luo, Yuan
McGarvey, Peter
Mendonca, Eneida A.
Mirhaji, Parsa
Murphy, Shawn
Osborne, John D.
Paschalidis, Ioannis C.
Harris, Paul A.
Prior, Fred
Shaheen, Nicholas J.
Shara, Nawar
Sim, Ida
Tachinardi, Umberto
Waitman, Lemuel R.
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zai, Adrian H.
Zheng, Kai
Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
Malin, Bradley A.
Natarajan, Karthik
Price II, W. Nicholson
Zhang, Rui
Zhang, Yiye
Xu, Hua
Bian, Jiang
Weng, Chunhua
Peng, Yifan
author_facet Idnay, Betina
Xu, Zihan
Adams, William G.
Adibuzzaman, Mohammad
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Bahroos, Neil
Bell, Douglas S.
Bumgardner, Cody
Campion, Thomas
Castro, Mario
Cimino, James J.
Cohen, I. Glenn
Dorr, David
Elkin, Peter L
Fan, Jungwei W.
Ferris, Todd
Foran, David J.
Hanauer, David
Hogarth, Mike
Huang, Kun
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
Kandpal, Manoj
Karnik, Niranjan S.
Katoch, Avnish
Lai, Albert M.
Lambert, Christophe G.
Li, Lang
Lindsell, Christopher
Liu, Jinze
Lu, Zhiyong
Luo, Yuan
McGarvey, Peter
Mendonca, Eneida A.
Mirhaji, Parsa
Murphy, Shawn
Osborne, John D.
Paschalidis, Ioannis C.
Harris, Paul A.
Prior, Fred
Shaheen, Nicholas J.
Shara, Nawar
Sim, Ida
Tachinardi, Umberto
Waitman, Lemuel R.
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zai, Adrian H.
Zheng, Kai
Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
Malin, Bradley A.
Natarajan, Karthik
Price II, W. Nicholson
Zhang, Rui
Zhang, Yiye
Xu, Hua
Bian, Jiang
Weng, Chunhua
Peng, Yifan
contents This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the United States. With the rapid advancement of GenAI technologies, including large language models (LLMs), healthcare institutions face unprecedented opportunities and challenges. This research explores the current status of GenAI integration, focusing on stakeholder roles, governance structures, and ethical considerations by administering a survey among leaders of health institutions (i.e., representing academic medical centers and health systems) to assess the institutional readiness and approach towards GenAI adoption. Key findings indicate a diverse range of institutional strategies, with most organizations in the experimental phase of GenAI deployment. The study highlights significant variations in governance models, with a strong preference for centralized decision-making but notable gaps in workforce training and ethical oversight. Moreover, the results underscore the need for a more coordinated approach to GenAI governance, emphasizing collaboration among senior leaders, clinicians, information technology staff, and researchers. Our analysis also reveals concerns regarding GenAI bias, data security, and stakeholder trust, which must be addressed to ensure the ethical and effective implementation of GenAI technologies. This study offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of GenAI integration in healthcare, providing a roadmap for institutions aiming to leverage GenAI for improved quality of care and operational efficiency.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_12793
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science
Idnay, Betina
Xu, Zihan
Adams, William G.
Adibuzzaman, Mohammad
Anderson, Nicholas R.
Bahroos, Neil
Bell, Douglas S.
Bumgardner, Cody
Campion, Thomas
Castro, Mario
Cimino, James J.
Cohen, I. Glenn
Dorr, David
Elkin, Peter L
Fan, Jungwei W.
Ferris, Todd
Foran, David J.
Hanauer, David
Hogarth, Mike
Huang, Kun
Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
Kandpal, Manoj
Karnik, Niranjan S.
Katoch, Avnish
Lai, Albert M.
Lambert, Christophe G.
Li, Lang
Lindsell, Christopher
Liu, Jinze
Lu, Zhiyong
Luo, Yuan
McGarvey, Peter
Mendonca, Eneida A.
Mirhaji, Parsa
Murphy, Shawn
Osborne, John D.
Paschalidis, Ioannis C.
Harris, Paul A.
Prior, Fred
Shaheen, Nicholas J.
Shara, Nawar
Sim, Ida
Tachinardi, Umberto
Waitman, Lemuel R.
Wright, Rosalind J.
Zai, Adrian H.
Zheng, Kai
Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
Malin, Bradley A.
Natarajan, Karthik
Price II, W. Nicholson
Zhang, Rui
Zhang, Yiye
Xu, Hua
Bian, Jiang
Weng, Chunhua
Peng, Yifan
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Program led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the United States. With the rapid advancement of GenAI technologies, including large language models (LLMs), healthcare institutions face unprecedented opportunities and challenges. This research explores the current status of GenAI integration, focusing on stakeholder roles, governance structures, and ethical considerations by administering a survey among leaders of health institutions (i.e., representing academic medical centers and health systems) to assess the institutional readiness and approach towards GenAI adoption. Key findings indicate a diverse range of institutional strategies, with most organizations in the experimental phase of GenAI deployment. The study highlights significant variations in governance models, with a strong preference for centralized decision-making but notable gaps in workforce training and ethical oversight. Moreover, the results underscore the need for a more coordinated approach to GenAI governance, emphasizing collaboration among senior leaders, clinicians, information technology staff, and researchers. Our analysis also reveals concerns regarding GenAI bias, data security, and stakeholder trust, which must be addressed to ensure the ethical and effective implementation of GenAI technologies. This study offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of GenAI integration in healthcare, providing a roadmap for institutions aiming to leverage GenAI for improved quality of care and operational efficiency.
title Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12793