Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groups
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916448883965952 |
|---|---|
| author | Rastogi, Charvi Teh, Tian Huey Mishra, Pushkar Patel, Roma Ashwood, Zoe Davani, Aida Mostafazadeh Diaz, Mark Paganini, Michela Parrish, Alicia Wang, Ding Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar Aroyo, Lora Rieser, Verena |
| author_facet | Rastogi, Charvi Teh, Tian Huey Mishra, Pushkar Patel, Roma Ashwood, Zoe Davani, Aida Mostafazadeh Diaz, Mark Paganini, Michela Parrish, Alicia Wang, Ding Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar Aroyo, Lora Rieser, Verena |
| contents | AI systems crucially rely on human ratings, but these ratings are often aggregated, obscuring the inherent diversity of perspectives in real-world phenomenon. This is particularly concerning when evaluating the safety of generative AI, where perceptions and associated harms can vary significantly across socio-cultural contexts. While recent research has studied the impact of demographic differences on annotating text, there is limited understanding of how these subjective variations affect multimodal safety in generative AI. To address this, we conduct a large-scale study employing highly-parallel safety ratings of about 1000 text-to-image (T2I) generations from a demographically diverse rater pool of 630 raters balanced across 30 intersectional groups across age, gender, and ethnicity. Our study shows that (1) there are significant differences across demographic groups (including intersectional groups) on how severe they assess the harm to be, and that these differences vary across different types of safety violations, (2) the diverse rater pool captures annotation patterns that are substantially different from expert raters trained on specific set of safety policies, and (3) the differences we observe in T2I safety are distinct from previously documented group level differences in text-based safety tasks. To further understand these varying perspectives, we conduct a qualitative analysis of the open-ended explanations provided by raters. This analysis reveals core differences into the reasons why different groups perceive harms in T2I generations. Our findings underscore the critical need for incorporating diverse perspectives into safety evaluation of generative AI ensuring these systems are truly inclusive and reflect the values of all users. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_17032 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groups Rastogi, Charvi Teh, Tian Huey Mishra, Pushkar Patel, Roma Ashwood, Zoe Davani, Aida Mostafazadeh Diaz, Mark Paganini, Michela Parrish, Alicia Wang, Ding Prabhakaran, Vinodkumar Aroyo, Lora Rieser, Verena Artificial Intelligence AI systems crucially rely on human ratings, but these ratings are often aggregated, obscuring the inherent diversity of perspectives in real-world phenomenon. This is particularly concerning when evaluating the safety of generative AI, where perceptions and associated harms can vary significantly across socio-cultural contexts. While recent research has studied the impact of demographic differences on annotating text, there is limited understanding of how these subjective variations affect multimodal safety in generative AI. To address this, we conduct a large-scale study employing highly-parallel safety ratings of about 1000 text-to-image (T2I) generations from a demographically diverse rater pool of 630 raters balanced across 30 intersectional groups across age, gender, and ethnicity. Our study shows that (1) there are significant differences across demographic groups (including intersectional groups) on how severe they assess the harm to be, and that these differences vary across different types of safety violations, (2) the diverse rater pool captures annotation patterns that are substantially different from expert raters trained on specific set of safety policies, and (3) the differences we observe in T2I safety are distinct from previously documented group level differences in text-based safety tasks. To further understand these varying perspectives, we conduct a qualitative analysis of the open-ended explanations provided by raters. This analysis reveals core differences into the reasons why different groups perceive harms in T2I generations. Our findings underscore the critical need for incorporating diverse perspectives into safety evaluation of generative AI ensuring these systems are truly inclusive and reflect the values of all users. |
| title | Insights on Disagreement Patterns in Multimodal Safety Perception across Diverse Rater Groups |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17032 |