Rules, Cases, and Reasoning: Positivist Legal Theory as a Framework for Pluralistic AI Alignment
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910672201187328 |
|---|---|
| author | Caputo, Nicholas A. |
| author_facet | Caputo, Nicholas A. |
| contents | Legal theory can address two related key problems of alignment: pluralism and specification. Alignment researchers must determine how to specify what is concretely meant by vague principles like helpfulness and fairness and they must ensure that their techniques do not exclude alternative perspectives on life and values. The law faces these same problems. Leading legal theories suggest the law solves these problems through the interaction of rules and cases, where general rules promulgated by a democratic authority are given specific content through their application over time. Concrete applications allow for convergence on practical meaning while preserving space for disagreement on values. These approaches suggest improvements to existing democratic alignment processes that use AI to create cases that give content to rules, allowing for more pluralist alignment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_17271 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Rules, Cases, and Reasoning: Positivist Legal Theory as a Framework for Pluralistic AI Alignment Caputo, Nicholas A. Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Legal theory can address two related key problems of alignment: pluralism and specification. Alignment researchers must determine how to specify what is concretely meant by vague principles like helpfulness and fairness and they must ensure that their techniques do not exclude alternative perspectives on life and values. The law faces these same problems. Leading legal theories suggest the law solves these problems through the interaction of rules and cases, where general rules promulgated by a democratic authority are given specific content through their application over time. Concrete applications allow for convergence on practical meaning while preserving space for disagreement on values. These approaches suggest improvements to existing democratic alignment processes that use AI to create cases that give content to rules, allowing for more pluralist alignment. |
| title | Rules, Cases, and Reasoning: Positivist Legal Theory as a Framework for Pluralistic AI Alignment |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17271 |