Exoplanet Imaging Data Challenge, phase II: Comparison of algorithms in terms of characterization capabilities
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909360077144064 |
|---|---|
| author | Cantalloube, Faustine Christiaens, Valentin Mitjans, Carles Cantero Cioppa, Anthony Nasedkin, Evert Absil, Olivier Delorme, Philippe Wang, Jason J. Bonse, Markus J. Daglayan, Hazan Dahlqvist, Carl-Henrik Guyot, Nathan Juillard, Sandrine Mazoyer, Johan Samland, Matthias Sabalbal, Mariam Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste Van Droogenbroeck, Marc |
| author_facet | Cantalloube, Faustine Christiaens, Valentin Mitjans, Carles Cantero Cioppa, Anthony Nasedkin, Evert Absil, Olivier Delorme, Philippe Wang, Jason J. Bonse, Markus J. Daglayan, Hazan Dahlqvist, Carl-Henrik Guyot, Nathan Juillard, Sandrine Mazoyer, Johan Samland, Matthias Sabalbal, Mariam Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste Van Droogenbroeck, Marc |
| contents | In this communication, we report on the results of the second phase of the Exoplanet Imaging Data Challenge started in 2019. This second phase focuses on the characterization of point sources (exoplanet signals) within multispectral high-contrast images from ground-based telescopes. We collected eight data sets from two high-contrast integral field spectrographs (namely Gemini-S/GPI and VLT/SPHERE-IFS) that we calibrated homogeneously, and in which we injected a handful of synthetic planetary signals (ground truth) to be characterized by the data challenge participants. The tasks of the participants consist of (1) extracting the precise astrometry of each injected planetary signals, and (2) extracting the precise spectro-photometry of each injected planetary signal. Additionally, the participants may provide the 1-sigma uncertainties on their estimation for further analyses. When available, the participants can also provide the posterior distribution used to estimate the position/spectrum and uncertainties. The data are permanently available on a Zenodo repository and the participants can submit their results through the EvalAI platform. The EvalAI submission platform opened on April 2022 and closed on the 31st of May 2024. In total, we received 4 valid submissions for the astrometry estimation and 4 valid submissions for the spectrophotometry (each submission, corresponding to one pipeline, has been submitted by a unique participant). In this communication, we present an analysis and interpretation of the results. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_17636 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exoplanet Imaging Data Challenge, phase II: Comparison of algorithms in terms of characterization capabilities Cantalloube, Faustine Christiaens, Valentin Mitjans, Carles Cantero Cioppa, Anthony Nasedkin, Evert Absil, Olivier Delorme, Philippe Wang, Jason J. Bonse, Markus J. Daglayan, Hazan Dahlqvist, Carl-Henrik Guyot, Nathan Juillard, Sandrine Mazoyer, Johan Samland, Matthias Sabalbal, Mariam Ruffio, Jean-Baptiste Van Droogenbroeck, Marc Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Earth and Planetary Astrophysics In this communication, we report on the results of the second phase of the Exoplanet Imaging Data Challenge started in 2019. This second phase focuses on the characterization of point sources (exoplanet signals) within multispectral high-contrast images from ground-based telescopes. We collected eight data sets from two high-contrast integral field spectrographs (namely Gemini-S/GPI and VLT/SPHERE-IFS) that we calibrated homogeneously, and in which we injected a handful of synthetic planetary signals (ground truth) to be characterized by the data challenge participants. The tasks of the participants consist of (1) extracting the precise astrometry of each injected planetary signals, and (2) extracting the precise spectro-photometry of each injected planetary signal. Additionally, the participants may provide the 1-sigma uncertainties on their estimation for further analyses. When available, the participants can also provide the posterior distribution used to estimate the position/spectrum and uncertainties. The data are permanently available on a Zenodo repository and the participants can submit their results through the EvalAI platform. The EvalAI submission platform opened on April 2022 and closed on the 31st of May 2024. In total, we received 4 valid submissions for the astrometry estimation and 4 valid submissions for the spectrophotometry (each submission, corresponding to one pipeline, has been submitted by a unique participant). In this communication, we present an analysis and interpretation of the results. |
| title | Exoplanet Imaging Data Challenge, phase II: Comparison of algorithms in terms of characterization capabilities |
| topic | Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Earth and Planetary Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17636 |