Profiling Near-Surface Winds on Mars Using Attitude Data from Mars 2020 Ingenuity

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jackson, Brian, Fenton, Lori, Brown, Travis, Munguira, Asier, Martinez, German, Newman, Claire, Viúdez-Moreiras, Daniel, Golombek, Matthew, Lorenz, Ralph, Paton, Mark D., Conway, Dylan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929557990277120
author Jackson, Brian
Fenton, Lori
Brown, Travis
Munguira, Asier
Martinez, German
Newman, Claire
Viúdez-Moreiras, Daniel
Golombek, Matthew
Lorenz, Ralph
Paton, Mark D.
Conway, Dylan
author_facet Jackson, Brian
Fenton, Lori
Brown, Travis
Munguira, Asier
Martinez, German
Newman, Claire
Viúdez-Moreiras, Daniel
Golombek, Matthew
Lorenz, Ralph
Paton, Mark D.
Conway, Dylan
contents We used attitude data from the Mars Ingenuity helicopter with a simple steady-state model to estimate windspeeds and directions at altitudes of 3 meters up to 24 meters, the first time winds at such altitudes have been probed on Mars. We compared our estimates to concurrent wind data at 1.5 m height from the meteorology package MEDA onboard the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover and to predictions from meteorological models. Wind directions inferred from the Ingenuity data agreed to within uncertainties with the directions measured by MEDA, when the latter were available, but deviated from model-predicted directions by as much as 180 deg in some cases. Also, the inferred windspeeds are often much higher than expected. For example, meteorological predictions tailored to the time and location of Ingenuity's 59th flight suggest Ingenuity should not have seen windspeeds above about 15 m/s, but we inferred speeds reaching nearly 25 m/s. By contrast, the 61st flight was at a similar time and season and showed weaker winds then the 59th flight, suggesting winds shaped by transient phenomena. For flights during which we have MEDA data to compare to, inferred windspeeds imply friction velocities exceeding 1 m/s and roughness lengths of more than 10 cm based on a boundary layer model that incorporates convective instability, which seem implausibly large. These results suggest Ingenuity was probing winds sensitive to aerodynamic conditions hundreds of meters upwind instead of the conditions very near Mars 2020, but they may also reflect a need for updated boundary layer wind models. An improved model for Ingenuity's aerodynamic response that includes the effects of transient winds may also modify our results. In any case, the work here provides a foundation for exploration of planetary boundary layers using drones and suggests important future avenues for research and development.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_19132
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Profiling Near-Surface Winds on Mars Using Attitude Data from Mars 2020 Ingenuity
Jackson, Brian
Fenton, Lori
Brown, Travis
Munguira, Asier
Martinez, German
Newman, Claire
Viúdez-Moreiras, Daniel
Golombek, Matthew
Lorenz, Ralph
Paton, Mark D.
Conway, Dylan
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
We used attitude data from the Mars Ingenuity helicopter with a simple steady-state model to estimate windspeeds and directions at altitudes of 3 meters up to 24 meters, the first time winds at such altitudes have been probed on Mars. We compared our estimates to concurrent wind data at 1.5 m height from the meteorology package MEDA onboard the Mars 2020 Perseverance rover and to predictions from meteorological models. Wind directions inferred from the Ingenuity data agreed to within uncertainties with the directions measured by MEDA, when the latter were available, but deviated from model-predicted directions by as much as 180 deg in some cases. Also, the inferred windspeeds are often much higher than expected. For example, meteorological predictions tailored to the time and location of Ingenuity's 59th flight suggest Ingenuity should not have seen windspeeds above about 15 m/s, but we inferred speeds reaching nearly 25 m/s. By contrast, the 61st flight was at a similar time and season and showed weaker winds then the 59th flight, suggesting winds shaped by transient phenomena. For flights during which we have MEDA data to compare to, inferred windspeeds imply friction velocities exceeding 1 m/s and roughness lengths of more than 10 cm based on a boundary layer model that incorporates convective instability, which seem implausibly large. These results suggest Ingenuity was probing winds sensitive to aerodynamic conditions hundreds of meters upwind instead of the conditions very near Mars 2020, but they may also reflect a need for updated boundary layer wind models. An improved model for Ingenuity's aerodynamic response that includes the effects of transient winds may also modify our results. In any case, the work here provides a foundation for exploration of planetary boundary layers using drones and suggests important future avenues for research and development.
title Profiling Near-Surface Winds on Mars Using Attitude Data from Mars 2020 Ingenuity
topic Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19132