The Galaxy Zoo Catalogs for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey
Fuente:
arXiv
Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866916455818199040 |
|---|---|
| author | Holwerda, Benne W. Robertson, Clayton Cook, Kyle Pimbblet, Kevin A. Casura, Sarah Sansom, Anne E. Patel, Divya Butrum, Trevor Glass, David H. W. Kelvin, Lee Baldry, Ivan K. De Propris, Roberto Bamford, Steven Masters, Karen Stone, Maria Hardin, Tim Walmsley, Mike Liske, Jochen Adnan, S M Rafee |
| author_facet | Holwerda, Benne W. Robertson, Clayton Cook, Kyle Pimbblet, Kevin A. Casura, Sarah Sansom, Anne E. Patel, Divya Butrum, Trevor Glass, David H. W. Kelvin, Lee Baldry, Ivan K. De Propris, Roberto Bamford, Steven Masters, Karen Stone, Maria Hardin, Tim Walmsley, Mike Liske, Jochen Adnan, S M Rafee |
| contents | Galaxy Zoo is an online project to classify morphological features in extra-galactic imaging surveys with public voting. In this paper, we compare the classifications made for two different surveys, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey and a part of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), in the equatorial fields of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our aim is to cross-validate and compare the classifications based on different imaging quality and depth.
We find that generally the voting agrees globally but with substantial scatter i.e. substantial differences for individual galaxies. There is a notable higher voting fraction in favor of ``smooth'' galaxies in the DESI+\rev{\sc zoobot} classifications, most likely due to the difference between imaging depth. DESI imaging is shallower and slightly lower resolution than KiDS and the Galaxy Zoo images do not reveal details such as disk features \rev{and thus are missed in the {\sc zoobot} training sample}. \rev{We check against expert visual classifications and find good agreement with KiDS-based Galaxy Zoo voting.}
We reproduce the results from Porter-Temple+ (2022), on the dependence of stellar mass, star-formation, and specific star-formation on the number of spiral arms. This shows that once corrected for redshift, the DESI Galaxy Zoo and KiDS Galaxy Zoo classifications agree well on population properties. The zoobot cross-validation increases confidence in its ability to compliment Galaxy Zoo classifications and its ability for transfer learning across surveys. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_19985 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | The Galaxy Zoo Catalogs for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey Holwerda, Benne W. Robertson, Clayton Cook, Kyle Pimbblet, Kevin A. Casura, Sarah Sansom, Anne E. Patel, Divya Butrum, Trevor Glass, David H. W. Kelvin, Lee Baldry, Ivan K. De Propris, Roberto Bamford, Steven Masters, Karen Stone, Maria Hardin, Tim Walmsley, Mike Liske, Jochen Adnan, S M Rafee Astrophysics of Galaxies Galaxy Zoo is an online project to classify morphological features in extra-galactic imaging surveys with public voting. In this paper, we compare the classifications made for two different surveys, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) imaging survey and a part of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), in the equatorial fields of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey. Our aim is to cross-validate and compare the classifications based on different imaging quality and depth. We find that generally the voting agrees globally but with substantial scatter i.e. substantial differences for individual galaxies. There is a notable higher voting fraction in favor of ``smooth'' galaxies in the DESI+\rev{\sc zoobot} classifications, most likely due to the difference between imaging depth. DESI imaging is shallower and slightly lower resolution than KiDS and the Galaxy Zoo images do not reveal details such as disk features \rev{and thus are missed in the {\sc zoobot} training sample}. \rev{We check against expert visual classifications and find good agreement with KiDS-based Galaxy Zoo voting.} We reproduce the results from Porter-Temple+ (2022), on the dependence of stellar mass, star-formation, and specific star-formation on the number of spiral arms. This shows that once corrected for redshift, the DESI Galaxy Zoo and KiDS Galaxy Zoo classifications agree well on population properties. The zoobot cross-validation increases confidence in its ability to compliment Galaxy Zoo classifications and its ability for transfer learning across surveys. |
| title | The Galaxy Zoo Catalogs for the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey |
| topic | Astrophysics of Galaxies |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19985 |