Comparative Global AI Regulation: Policy Perspectives from the EU, China, and the US
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913565999366144 |
|---|---|
| author | Chun, Jon de Witt, Christian Schroeder Elkins, Katherine |
| author_facet | Chun, Jon de Witt, Christian Schroeder Elkins, Katherine |
| contents | As a powerful and rapidly advancing dual-use technology, AI offers both immense benefits and worrisome risks. In response, governing bodies around the world are developing a range of regulatory AI laws and policies. This paper compares three distinct approaches taken by the EU, China and the US. Within the US, we explore AI regulation at both the federal and state level, with a focus on California's pending Senate Bill 1047. Each regulatory system reflects distinct cultural, political and economic perspectives. Each also highlights differing regional perspectives on regulatory risk-benefit tradeoffs, with divergent judgments on the balance between safety versus innovation and cooperation versus competition. Finally, differences between regulatory frameworks reflect contrastive stances in regards to trust in centralized authority versus trust in a more decentralized free market of self-interested stakeholders. Taken together, these varied approaches to AI innovation and regulation influence each other, the broader international community, and the future of AI regulation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_21279 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comparative Global AI Regulation: Policy Perspectives from the EU, China, and the US Chun, Jon de Witt, Christian Schroeder Elkins, Katherine Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence 91B32, 68T01 91B32, 68T99, 91F10, 91F50 K.5.1; K.4.1; K.5.2 As a powerful and rapidly advancing dual-use technology, AI offers both immense benefits and worrisome risks. In response, governing bodies around the world are developing a range of regulatory AI laws and policies. This paper compares three distinct approaches taken by the EU, China and the US. Within the US, we explore AI regulation at both the federal and state level, with a focus on California's pending Senate Bill 1047. Each regulatory system reflects distinct cultural, political and economic perspectives. Each also highlights differing regional perspectives on regulatory risk-benefit tradeoffs, with divergent judgments on the balance between safety versus innovation and cooperation versus competition. Finally, differences between regulatory frameworks reflect contrastive stances in regards to trust in centralized authority versus trust in a more decentralized free market of self-interested stakeholders. Taken together, these varied approaches to AI innovation and regulation influence each other, the broader international community, and the future of AI regulation. |
| title | Comparative Global AI Regulation: Policy Perspectives from the EU, China, and the US |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence 91B32, 68T01 91B32, 68T99, 91F10, 91F50 K.5.1; K.4.1; K.5.2 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21279 |