Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brennan, Jennifer, Lahaie, Sébastien, Javanmard, Adel, Doudchenko, Nick, Pouget-Abadie, Jean
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21464
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910973035544576
author Brennan, Jennifer
Lahaie, Sébastien
Javanmard, Adel
Doudchenko, Nick
Pouget-Abadie, Jean
author_facet Brennan, Jennifer
Lahaie, Sébastien
Javanmard, Adel
Doudchenko, Nick
Pouget-Abadie, Jean
contents In experimental causal inference, we distinguish between two sources of uncertainty: design uncertainty, due to the treatment assignment mechanism, and sampling uncertainty, when the sample is drawn from a super-population. This distinction matters in settings with small fixed samples and heterogeneous treatment effects, as in geographical experiments. The standard bootstrap procedure most often used by practitioners primarily estimates sampling uncertainty, and the causal bootstrap procedure, which accounts for design uncertainty, was developed for the completely randomized design and the difference-in-means estimator, whereas non-standard designs and estimators are often used in these low-power regimes. We address this gap by proposing an integer program which computes numerically the worst-case copula used as an input to the causal bootstrap method, in a wide range of settings. Specifically, we prove the asymptotic validity of our approach for unconfounded, conditionally unconfounded, and and individualistic with bounded confoundedness assignments, as well as generalizing to any linear-in-treatment and quadratic-in-treatment estimators. We demonstrate the refined confidence intervals achieved through simulations of small geographical experiments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_21464
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Integer Programming for Generalized Causal Bootstrap Designs
Brennan, Jennifer
Lahaie, Sébastien
Javanmard, Adel
Doudchenko, Nick
Pouget-Abadie, Jean
Methodology
In experimental causal inference, we distinguish between two sources of uncertainty: design uncertainty, due to the treatment assignment mechanism, and sampling uncertainty, when the sample is drawn from a super-population. This distinction matters in settings with small fixed samples and heterogeneous treatment effects, as in geographical experiments. The standard bootstrap procedure most often used by practitioners primarily estimates sampling uncertainty, and the causal bootstrap procedure, which accounts for design uncertainty, was developed for the completely randomized design and the difference-in-means estimator, whereas non-standard designs and estimators are often used in these low-power regimes. We address this gap by proposing an integer program which computes numerically the worst-case copula used as an input to the causal bootstrap method, in a wide range of settings. Specifically, we prove the asymptotic validity of our approach for unconfounded, conditionally unconfounded, and and individualistic with bounded confoundedness assignments, as well as generalizing to any linear-in-treatment and quadratic-in-treatment estimators. We demonstrate the refined confidence intervals achieved through simulations of small geographical experiments.
title Integer Programming for Generalized Causal Bootstrap Designs
topic Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21464