Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lenz, Oliver Urs, van Leeuwen, Matthijs
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23158
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910987876040704
author Lenz, Oliver Urs
van Leeuwen, Matthijs
author_facet Lenz, Oliver Urs
van Leeuwen, Matthijs
contents Semi-supervised anomaly detection is based on the principle that potential anomalies are those records that look different from normal training data. However, in some cases we are specifically interested in anomalies that correspond to high attribute values (or low, but not both). We present two asymmetrical distance measures that take this monotonicity into account: ramp distance and signed distance. Through experiments on synthetic and real-life datasets, we show that ramp distance increases anomaly detection performance over the traditional absolute distance. While signed distance also performs well on synthetic data, it performs substantially poorer on real-life datasets. We argue that this is a consequence of the fact that when using signed distance, low values of certain attributes automatically compensate for high values of other attributes, such that anomaly detection is reduced to counting the total attribute value sum, which is too simplistic in practice.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_23158
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Monotonic anomaly detection
Lenz, Oliver Urs
van Leeuwen, Matthijs
Machine Learning
Semi-supervised anomaly detection is based on the principle that potential anomalies are those records that look different from normal training data. However, in some cases we are specifically interested in anomalies that correspond to high attribute values (or low, but not both). We present two asymmetrical distance measures that take this monotonicity into account: ramp distance and signed distance. Through experiments on synthetic and real-life datasets, we show that ramp distance increases anomaly detection performance over the traditional absolute distance. While signed distance also performs well on synthetic data, it performs substantially poorer on real-life datasets. We argue that this is a consequence of the fact that when using signed distance, low values of certain attributes automatically compensate for high values of other attributes, such that anomaly detection is reduced to counting the total attribute value sum, which is too simplistic in practice.
title Monotonic anomaly detection
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23158