Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yamin, Khurram, Gupta, Shantanu, Ghosal, Gaurav R., Lipton, Zachary C., Wilder, Bryan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915342456979456
author Yamin, Khurram
Gupta, Shantanu
Ghosal, Gaurav R.
Lipton, Zachary C.
Wilder, Bryan
author_facet Yamin, Khurram
Gupta, Shantanu
Ghosal, Gaurav R.
Lipton, Zachary C.
Wilder, Bryan
contents The ability to robustly identify causal relationships is essential for autonomous decision-making and adaptation to novel scenarios. However, accurately inferring causal structure requires integrating both world knowledge and abstract logical reasoning. In this work, we investigate the interaction between these two capabilities through the representative task of causal reasoning over narratives. Through controlled synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world experiments, we find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial heuristics -- for example, inferring causality from event order or recalling memorized world knowledge without attending to context. Furthermore, we show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior. Our evaluation spans a range of causal structures, from linear chains to complex graphs involving colliders and forks. These findings uncover systematic patterns in how LLMs perform causal reasoning and lay the groundwork for developing methods that better align LLM behavior with principled causal inference.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2410_23884
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives
Yamin, Khurram
Gupta, Shantanu
Ghosal, Gaurav R.
Lipton, Zachary C.
Wilder, Bryan
Machine Learning
Computation and Language
The ability to robustly identify causal relationships is essential for autonomous decision-making and adaptation to novel scenarios. However, accurately inferring causal structure requires integrating both world knowledge and abstract logical reasoning. In this work, we investigate the interaction between these two capabilities through the representative task of causal reasoning over narratives. Through controlled synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real-world experiments, we find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial heuristics -- for example, inferring causality from event order or recalling memorized world knowledge without attending to context. Furthermore, we show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior. Our evaluation spans a range of causal structures, from linear chains to complex graphs involving colliders and forks. These findings uncover systematic patterns in how LLMs perform causal reasoning and lay the groundwork for developing methods that better align LLM behavior with principled causal inference.
title Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives
topic Machine Learning
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23884