Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01007 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917827124920320 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosbach, Emely Ammeling, Jonas Krügel, Sebastian Kießig, Angelika Fritz, Alexis Ganz, Jonathan Puget, Chloé Donovan, Taryn Klang, Andrea Köller, Maximilian C. Bolfa, Pompei Tecilla, Marco Denk, Daniela Kiupel, Matti Paraschou, Georgios Kok, Mun Keong Haake, Alexander F. H. de Krijger, Ronald R. Sonnen, Andreas F. -P. Kasantikul, Tanit Dorrestein, Gerry M. Smedley, Rebecca C. Stathonikos, Nikolas Uhl, Matthias Bertram, Christof A. Riener, Andreas Aubreville, Marc |
| author_facet | Rosbach, Emely Ammeling, Jonas Krügel, Sebastian Kießig, Angelika Fritz, Alexis Ganz, Jonathan Puget, Chloé Donovan, Taryn Klang, Andrea Köller, Maximilian C. Bolfa, Pompei Tecilla, Marco Denk, Daniela Kiupel, Matti Paraschou, Georgios Kok, Mun Keong Haake, Alexander F. H. de Krijger, Ronald R. Sonnen, Andreas F. -P. Kasantikul, Tanit Dorrestein, Gerry M. Smedley, Rebecca C. Stathonikos, Nikolas Uhl, Matthias Bertram, Christof A. Riener, Andreas Aubreville, Marc |
| contents | Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in computational pathology. However, human-AI collaboration can introduce and amplify cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias caused by false confirmation when erroneous human opinions are reinforced by inaccurate AI output. This bias may worsen when time pressure, ubiquitously present in routine pathology, strains practitioners' cognitive resources. We quantified confirmation bias triggered by AI-induced false confirmation and examined the role of time constraints in a web-based experiment, where trained pathology experts (n=28) estimated tumor cell percentages. Our results suggest that AI integration may fuel confirmation bias, evidenced by a statistically significant positive linear-mixed-effects model coefficient linking AI recommendations mirroring flawed human judgment and alignment with system advice. Conversely, time pressure appeared to weaken this relationship. These findings highlight potential risks of AI use in healthcare and aim to support the safe integration of clinical decision support systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_01007 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | When Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" -- Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational Pathology Rosbach, Emely Ammeling, Jonas Krügel, Sebastian Kießig, Angelika Fritz, Alexis Ganz, Jonathan Puget, Chloé Donovan, Taryn Klang, Andrea Köller, Maximilian C. Bolfa, Pompei Tecilla, Marco Denk, Daniela Kiupel, Matti Paraschou, Georgios Kok, Mun Keong Haake, Alexander F. H. de Krijger, Ronald R. Sonnen, Andreas F. -P. Kasantikul, Tanit Dorrestein, Gerry M. Smedley, Rebecca C. Stathonikos, Nikolas Uhl, Matthias Bertram, Christof A. Riener, Andreas Aubreville, Marc Human-Computer Interaction Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support systems hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in computational pathology. However, human-AI collaboration can introduce and amplify cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias caused by false confirmation when erroneous human opinions are reinforced by inaccurate AI output. This bias may worsen when time pressure, ubiquitously present in routine pathology, strains practitioners' cognitive resources. We quantified confirmation bias triggered by AI-induced false confirmation and examined the role of time constraints in a web-based experiment, where trained pathology experts (n=28) estimated tumor cell percentages. Our results suggest that AI integration may fuel confirmation bias, evidenced by a statistically significant positive linear-mixed-effects model coefficient linking AI recommendations mirroring flawed human judgment and alignment with system advice. Conversely, time pressure appeared to weaken this relationship. These findings highlight potential risks of AI use in healthcare and aim to support the safe integration of clinical decision support systems. |
| title | When Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right" -- Examining Confirmation Bias and the Role of Time Pressure During Human-AI Collaboration in Computational Pathology |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01007 |