Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Zhang, Chao, Geng, Zhi, Li, Wei, Ding, Peng
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2024
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01234
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866911117880590336
author Zhang, Chao
Geng, Zhi
Li, Wei
Ding, Peng
author_facet Zhang, Chao
Geng, Zhi
Li, Wei
Ding, Peng
contents Although the existing causal inference literature focuses on the forward-looking perspective by estimating effects of causes, the backward-looking perspective can provide insights into causes of effects. In backward-looking causal inference, the probability of necessity measures the probability that a certain event is caused by the treatment given the observed treatment and outcome. Most existing results focus on binary outcomes. Motivated by applications with ordinal outcomes, we propose a general definition of the probability of necessity. However, identifying the probability of necessity is challenging because it involves the joint distribution of the potential outcomes. We propose a novel assumption of monotonic incremental treatment effect to identify the probability of necessity with ordinal outcomes. We also discuss the testable implications of this key identification assumption. When it fails, we derive explicit formulas of the sharp large-sample bounds on the probability of necessity.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_01234
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Identifying and bounding the probability of necessity for causes of effects with ordinal outcomes
Zhang, Chao
Geng, Zhi
Li, Wei
Ding, Peng
Statistics Theory
Although the existing causal inference literature focuses on the forward-looking perspective by estimating effects of causes, the backward-looking perspective can provide insights into causes of effects. In backward-looking causal inference, the probability of necessity measures the probability that a certain event is caused by the treatment given the observed treatment and outcome. Most existing results focus on binary outcomes. Motivated by applications with ordinal outcomes, we propose a general definition of the probability of necessity. However, identifying the probability of necessity is challenging because it involves the joint distribution of the potential outcomes. We propose a novel assumption of monotonic incremental treatment effect to identify the probability of necessity with ordinal outcomes. We also discuss the testable implications of this key identification assumption. When it fails, we derive explicit formulas of the sharp large-sample bounds on the probability of necessity.
title Identifying and bounding the probability of necessity for causes of effects with ordinal outcomes
topic Statistics Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01234