Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Zijun, Zhao, Qingyuan
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01625
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911191382622208
author Gao, Zijun
Zhao, Qingyuan
author_facet Gao, Zijun
Zhao, Qingyuan
contents Existing tools for explaining complex models and systems are associational rather than causal and do not provide mechanistic understanding. We propose a new notion called counterfactual explainability for causal attribution that is motivated by the concept of genetic heritability in twin studies. Counterfactual explainability extends methods for global sensitivity analysis (including the functional analysis of variance and Sobol's indices), which assumes independent explanatory variables, to dependent explanations by using a directed acyclic graphs to describe their causal relationship. Therefore, this explanability measure directly incorporates causal mechanisms by construction. Under a comonotonicity assumption, we discuss methods for estimating counterfactual explainability and apply them to a real dataset dataset to explain income inequality by gender, race, and educational attainment.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_01625
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variance
Gao, Zijun
Zhao, Qingyuan
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Existing tools for explaining complex models and systems are associational rather than causal and do not provide mechanistic understanding. We propose a new notion called counterfactual explainability for causal attribution that is motivated by the concept of genetic heritability in twin studies. Counterfactual explainability extends methods for global sensitivity analysis (including the functional analysis of variance and Sobol's indices), which assumes independent explanatory variables, to dependent explanations by using a directed acyclic graphs to describe their causal relationship. Therefore, this explanability measure directly incorporates causal mechanisms by construction. Under a comonotonicity assumption, we discuss methods for estimating counterfactual explainability and apply them to a real dataset dataset to explain income inequality by gender, race, and educational attainment.
title Counterfactual explainability and analysis of variance
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01625