Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perotti, Juan Ignacio
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916660094435328
author Perotti, Juan Ignacio
author_facet Perotti, Juan Ignacio
contents The inference of rankings plays a central role in the theory of social choice, which seeks to establish preferences from collectively generated data, such as pairwise comparisons. Examples include political elections, ranking athletes based on competition results, ordering web pages in search engines using hyperlink networks, and generating recommendations in online stores based on user behavior. Various methods have been developed to infer rankings from incomplete or conflicting data. One such method, HodgeRank, introduced by Jiang {\em et al.}~[Math. Program. {\bf 127}, 203 (2011)], utilizes Hodge decomposition of cochains in higher--order networks to disentangle gradient and cyclical components contributing to rating scores, enabling a parsimonious inference of ratings and rankings for lists of items. This paper presents a systematic study of HodgeRank's performance under the influence of quenched disorder and across networks with complex topologies generated by four different network models. The results reveal a transition from a regime of perfect retrieval of true rankings to one of imperfect retrieval as the strength of the quenched disorder increases. A range of observables are analyzed, and their scaling behavior with respect to the network model parameters is characterized. This work advances the understanding of social choice theory and the inference of ratings and rankings within complex network structures.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_02434
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Analysis of the inference of ratings and rankings in complex networks using discrete exterior calculus on higher--order networks
Perotti, Juan Ignacio
Social and Information Networks
Computational Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Physics and Society
The inference of rankings plays a central role in the theory of social choice, which seeks to establish preferences from collectively generated data, such as pairwise comparisons. Examples include political elections, ranking athletes based on competition results, ordering web pages in search engines using hyperlink networks, and generating recommendations in online stores based on user behavior. Various methods have been developed to infer rankings from incomplete or conflicting data. One such method, HodgeRank, introduced by Jiang {\em et al.}~[Math. Program. {\bf 127}, 203 (2011)], utilizes Hodge decomposition of cochains in higher--order networks to disentangle gradient and cyclical components contributing to rating scores, enabling a parsimonious inference of ratings and rankings for lists of items. This paper presents a systematic study of HodgeRank's performance under the influence of quenched disorder and across networks with complex topologies generated by four different network models. The results reveal a transition from a regime of perfect retrieval of true rankings to one of imperfect retrieval as the strength of the quenched disorder increases. A range of observables are analyzed, and their scaling behavior with respect to the network model parameters is characterized. This work advances the understanding of social choice theory and the inference of ratings and rankings within complex network structures.
title Analysis of the inference of ratings and rankings in complex networks using discrete exterior calculus on higher--order networks
topic Social and Information Networks
Computational Physics
Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
Physics and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02434