Benchmarking XAI Explanations with Human-Aligned Evaluations

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazmierczak, Rémi, Azzolin, Steve, Berthier, Eloïse, Hedström, Anna, Delhomme, Patricia, Filliat, David, Bousquet, Nicolas, Frehse, Goran, Mancini, Massimiliano, Caramiaux, Baptiste, Passerini, Andrea, Franchi, Gianni
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866908502788669440
author Kazmierczak, Rémi
Azzolin, Steve
Berthier, Eloïse
Hedström, Anna
Delhomme, Patricia
Filliat, David
Bousquet, Nicolas
Frehse, Goran
Mancini, Massimiliano
Caramiaux, Baptiste
Passerini, Andrea
Franchi, Gianni
author_facet Kazmierczak, Rémi
Azzolin, Steve
Berthier, Eloïse
Hedström, Anna
Delhomme, Patricia
Filliat, David
Bousquet, Nicolas
Frehse, Goran
Mancini, Massimiliano
Caramiaux, Baptiste
Passerini, Andrea
Franchi, Gianni
contents We introduce PASTA (Perceptual Assessment System for explanaTion of Artificial Intelligence), a novel human-centric framework for evaluating eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques in computer vision. Our first contribution is the creation of the PASTA-dataset, the first large-scale benchmark that spans a diverse set of models and both saliency-based and concept-based explanation methods. This dataset enables robust, comparative analysis of XAI techniques based on human judgment. Our second contribution is an automated, data-driven benchmark that predicts human preferences using the PASTA-dataset. This scoring called PASTA-score method offers scalable, reliable, and consistent evaluation aligned with human perception. Additionally, our benchmark allows for comparisons between explanations across different modalities, an aspect previously unaddressed. We then propose to apply our scoring method to probe the interpretability of existing models and to build more human interpretable XAI methods.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_02470
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Benchmarking XAI Explanations with Human-Aligned Evaluations
Kazmierczak, Rémi
Azzolin, Steve
Berthier, Eloïse
Hedström, Anna
Delhomme, Patricia
Filliat, David
Bousquet, Nicolas
Frehse, Goran
Mancini, Massimiliano
Caramiaux, Baptiste
Passerini, Andrea
Franchi, Gianni
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
We introduce PASTA (Perceptual Assessment System for explanaTion of Artificial Intelligence), a novel human-centric framework for evaluating eXplainable AI (XAI) techniques in computer vision. Our first contribution is the creation of the PASTA-dataset, the first large-scale benchmark that spans a diverse set of models and both saliency-based and concept-based explanation methods. This dataset enables robust, comparative analysis of XAI techniques based on human judgment. Our second contribution is an automated, data-driven benchmark that predicts human preferences using the PASTA-dataset. This scoring called PASTA-score method offers scalable, reliable, and consistent evaluation aligned with human perception. Additionally, our benchmark allows for comparisons between explanations across different modalities, an aspect previously unaddressed. We then propose to apply our scoring method to probe the interpretability of existing models and to build more human interpretable XAI methods.
title Benchmarking XAI Explanations with Human-Aligned Evaluations
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02470