Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armentia, Mikel, Abasolo, Mikel, Coria, Ibai, Albizuri, Joseba, Aguirrebeitia, Josu
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03733
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912107107188736
author Armentia, Mikel
Abasolo, Mikel
Coria, Ibai
Albizuri, Joseba
Aguirrebeitia, Josu
author_facet Armentia, Mikel
Abasolo, Mikel
Coria, Ibai
Albizuri, Joseba
Aguirrebeitia, Josu
contents Statement of problem. Cold rolling is widely used for screw thread manufacturing in industry but is less common in implant dentistry, where cutting is the preferred manufacturing method. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the surface finish and mechanical performance of a specific model of prosthetic screw used for direct restorations manufactured by thread rolling and cutting. Material and methods. The thread profiles were measured in an optical measuring machine, the residual stresses in an X-ray diffractometer, the surface finish in a scanning electron microscope, and then fatigue and static load tests were carried out in a direct stress test bench according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14801. Finally, linear regression models and 95% interval confidence bands were calculated and compared through ANCOVA for fatigue tests while the t test was used for statistical comparisons (a=.05). Results. The surface finish was smoother, and compressive residual stresses were higher for the roll-threaded screws. Linear regression models showed a fatigue life 9 times higher for roll-threaded screws (P=1) without affecting static behavior, which showed statistically similar static strengths (P=.54). However, the thread profile in the roll-threaded screws was not accurately reproduced, but this should be easily corrected in future prototypes. Conclusions. Rolling was demonstrated to be a better thread-manufacturing process for prosthetic screws, producing improved surface quality and fatigue behavior.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_03733
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Fatigue performance of prosthetic screws used in dental implant restorations: Rolled versus cut threads
Armentia, Mikel
Abasolo, Mikel
Coria, Ibai
Albizuri, Joseba
Aguirrebeitia, Josu
Medical Physics
Systems and Control
Statement of problem. Cold rolling is widely used for screw thread manufacturing in industry but is less common in implant dentistry, where cutting is the preferred manufacturing method. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the surface finish and mechanical performance of a specific model of prosthetic screw used for direct restorations manufactured by thread rolling and cutting. Material and methods. The thread profiles were measured in an optical measuring machine, the residual stresses in an X-ray diffractometer, the surface finish in a scanning electron microscope, and then fatigue and static load tests were carried out in a direct stress test bench according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14801. Finally, linear regression models and 95% interval confidence bands were calculated and compared through ANCOVA for fatigue tests while the t test was used for statistical comparisons (a=.05). Results. The surface finish was smoother, and compressive residual stresses were higher for the roll-threaded screws. Linear regression models showed a fatigue life 9 times higher for roll-threaded screws (P=1) without affecting static behavior, which showed statistically similar static strengths (P=.54). However, the thread profile in the roll-threaded screws was not accurately reproduced, but this should be easily corrected in future prototypes. Conclusions. Rolling was demonstrated to be a better thread-manufacturing process for prosthetic screws, producing improved surface quality and fatigue behavior.
title Fatigue performance of prosthetic screws used in dental implant restorations: Rolled versus cut threads
topic Medical Physics
Systems and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03733