Where postdoctoral journeys lead

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duan, Yueran, Memon, Shahan Ali, AlShebli, Bedoor, Guan, Qing, Holme, Petter, Rahwan, Talal
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866929683822542848
author Duan, Yueran
Memon, Shahan Ali
AlShebli, Bedoor
Guan, Qing
Holme, Petter
Rahwan, Talal
author_facet Duan, Yueran
Memon, Shahan Ali
AlShebli, Bedoor
Guan, Qing
Holme, Petter
Rahwan, Talal
contents Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique data set of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions -- in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers -- relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: it seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_03938
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Where postdoctoral journeys lead
Duan, Yueran
Memon, Shahan Ali
AlShebli, Bedoor
Guan, Qing
Holme, Petter
Rahwan, Talal
Computers and Society
Physics and Society
Postdoctoral training is a career stage often described as a demanding and anxiety-laden time when many promising PhDs see their academic dreams slip away due to circumstances beyond their control. We use a unique data set of academic publishing and careers to chart the more or less successful postdoctoral paths. We build a measure of academic success on the citation patterns two to five years into a faculty career. Then, we monitor how students' postdoc positions -- in terms of relocation, change of topic, and early well-cited papers -- relate to their early-career success. One key finding is that the postdoc period seems more important than the doctoral training to achieve this form of success. This is especially interesting in light of the many studies of academic faculty hiring that link Ph.D. granting institutions and hires, omitting the postdoc stage. Another group of findings can be summarized as a Goldilocks principle: it seems beneficial to change one's direction, but not too much.
title Where postdoctoral journeys lead
topic Computers and Society
Physics and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03938