Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04132 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915008082870272 |
|---|---|
| author | Xu, Haowei Li, Ju |
| author_facet | Xu, Haowei Li, Ju |
| contents | In the Letter [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)], Ferraro \emph{et al.} claimed a quantum advantage in the Dicke quantum battery (QB), whereby $N$ two-level systems (TLS) are coupled to a common photonic mode of a cavity. They argued that compared with the so-called Rabi QB, the Dicke QB exhibits a $\sqrt{N}$ quantum enhancement in the charging power because of the entanglement created by the common photonic mode. In this Comment, however, we demonstrate that the apparent $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement actually comes from the stronger cavity electric (or magnetic) field under the setup discussed in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)]. This is a trivial classical effect, and there is no true "quantum advantage" in the charging power of the Dicke QB. While somewhat similar questions regarding the origin of the claimed "quantum advantage" have been raised before, here we would like to make it clear that the $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)] is purely a classical effect, not attributable to quantum entanglement or collective phenomena. Therefore, we believe that using the term "quantum battery" in this context may be inappropriate and misleading. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_04132 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Comment on "High-Power Collective Charging of a Solid-State Quantum Battery" Xu, Haowei Li, Ju Quantum Physics In the Letter [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)], Ferraro \emph{et al.} claimed a quantum advantage in the Dicke quantum battery (QB), whereby $N$ two-level systems (TLS) are coupled to a common photonic mode of a cavity. They argued that compared with the so-called Rabi QB, the Dicke QB exhibits a $\sqrt{N}$ quantum enhancement in the charging power because of the entanglement created by the common photonic mode. In this Comment, however, we demonstrate that the apparent $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement actually comes from the stronger cavity electric (or magnetic) field under the setup discussed in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)]. This is a trivial classical effect, and there is no true "quantum advantage" in the charging power of the Dicke QB. While somewhat similar questions regarding the origin of the claimed "quantum advantage" have been raised before, here we would like to make it clear that the $\sqrt{N}$ enhancement in [Physical Review Letters 120, 117702 (2018)] is purely a classical effect, not attributable to quantum entanglement or collective phenomena. Therefore, we believe that using the term "quantum battery" in this context may be inappropriate and misleading. |
| title | Comment on "High-Power Collective Charging of a Solid-State Quantum Battery" |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04132 |