OpenAI-o1 AB Testing: Does the o1 model really do good reasoning in math problem solving?
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910692561387520 |
|---|---|
| author | Li, Leo Luo, Ye Pan, Tingyou |
| author_facet | Li, Leo Luo, Ye Pan, Tingyou |
| contents | The Orion-1 model by OpenAI is claimed to have more robust logical reasoning capabilities than previous large language models. However, some suggest the excellence might be partially due to the model "memorizing" solutions, resulting in less satisfactory performance when prompted with problems not in the training data. We conduct a comparison experiment using two datasets: one consisting of International Mathematics Olympiad (IMO) problems, which is easily accessible; the other one consisting of Chinese National Team Training camp (CNT) problems, which have similar difficulty but not as publically accessible. We label the response for each problem and compare the performance between the two datasets. We conclude that there is no significant evidence to show that the model relies on memorizing problems and solutions. Also, we perform case studies to analyze some features of the model's response. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_06198 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | OpenAI-o1 AB Testing: Does the o1 model really do good reasoning in math problem solving? Li, Leo Luo, Ye Pan, Tingyou Artificial Intelligence The Orion-1 model by OpenAI is claimed to have more robust logical reasoning capabilities than previous large language models. However, some suggest the excellence might be partially due to the model "memorizing" solutions, resulting in less satisfactory performance when prompted with problems not in the training data. We conduct a comparison experiment using two datasets: one consisting of International Mathematics Olympiad (IMO) problems, which is easily accessible; the other one consisting of Chinese National Team Training camp (CNT) problems, which have similar difficulty but not as publically accessible. We label the response for each problem and compare the performance between the two datasets. We conclude that there is no significant evidence to show that the model relies on memorizing problems and solutions. Also, we perform case studies to analyze some features of the model's response. |
| title | OpenAI-o1 AB Testing: Does the o1 model really do good reasoning in math problem solving? |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06198 |