Equitable list coloring of sparse graphs
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866918264235360256 |
|---|---|
| author | Kierstead, H. A. Kostochka, Alexandr Xiang, Zimu |
| author_facet | Kierstead, H. A. Kostochka, Alexandr Xiang, Zimu |
| contents | A proper vertex coloring of a graph is equitable if the sizes of all color classes differ by at most $1$. For a list assignment $L$ of $k$ colors to each vertex of an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$ from their lists such that no color is used more than $\lceil n/k\rceil$ times. Call a graph equitably $k$-choosable if it has an equitable $L$-coloring for every $k$-list assignment $L$. A graph $G$ is $(a,b)$-sparse if for every $A\subseteq V(G)$, the number of edges in the subgraph $G[A]$ of $G$ induced by $A$ is at most $a|A|+b$.
Our first main result is that every $(\frac{7}{6},\frac{1}{3})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $3$-colorable and equitably $3$-choosable. This is sharp. Our second main result is that every $(\frac{5}{4},\frac{1}{2})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $4$-colorable and equitably $4$-choosable. This is also sharp.
One of the tools in the proof is the new notion of strongly equitable (SE) list coloring. This notion is both stronger and more natural than equitable list coloring; and our upper bounds are for SE list coloring. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_08372 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Equitable list coloring of sparse graphs Kierstead, H. A. Kostochka, Alexandr Xiang, Zimu Combinatorics 05C15, 05C35 A proper vertex coloring of a graph is equitable if the sizes of all color classes differ by at most $1$. For a list assignment $L$ of $k$ colors to each vertex of an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$ from their lists such that no color is used more than $\lceil n/k\rceil$ times. Call a graph equitably $k$-choosable if it has an equitable $L$-coloring for every $k$-list assignment $L$. A graph $G$ is $(a,b)$-sparse if for every $A\subseteq V(G)$, the number of edges in the subgraph $G[A]$ of $G$ induced by $A$ is at most $a|A|+b$. Our first main result is that every $(\frac{7}{6},\frac{1}{3})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $3$-colorable and equitably $3$-choosable. This is sharp. Our second main result is that every $(\frac{5}{4},\frac{1}{2})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $4$-colorable and equitably $4$-choosable. This is also sharp. One of the tools in the proof is the new notion of strongly equitable (SE) list coloring. This notion is both stronger and more natural than equitable list coloring; and our upper bounds are for SE list coloring. |
| title | Equitable list coloring of sparse graphs |
| topic | Combinatorics 05C15, 05C35 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08372 |