One or two poles for the $Ξ(1820)$?

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Molina, R., Liang, Wei-Hong, Xiao, Chu-Wen, Sun, Zhi-Feng, Oset, E.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2024
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910698025517056
author Molina, R.
Liang, Wei-Hong
Xiao, Chu-Wen
Sun, Zhi-Feng
Oset, E.
author_facet Molina, R.
Liang, Wei-Hong
Xiao, Chu-Wen
Sun, Zhi-Feng
Oset, E.
contents In this talk, we present a new interpretation for the recently observed $Ξ(1820)$ resonance. We recall that the chiral unitary approach for the interaction of pseudoscalar mesons with the baryons of the decuplet predicts two states for the $Ξ(1820)$ resonance, one with a narrow width and the other one with a large width. We contrast this fact with the recent BESIII measurement of the $K^- Λ$ mass distribution in the $ψ(3686)$ decay to $K^- Λ\barΞ^+ $, which demands a width much larger than the average of the PDG, and show how the consideration of the two $Ξ(1820)$ states provides a natural explanation to this apparent contradiction.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_09610
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle One or two poles for the $Ξ(1820)$?
Molina, R.
Liang, Wei-Hong
Xiao, Chu-Wen
Sun, Zhi-Feng
Oset, E.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
In this talk, we present a new interpretation for the recently observed $Ξ(1820)$ resonance. We recall that the chiral unitary approach for the interaction of pseudoscalar mesons with the baryons of the decuplet predicts two states for the $Ξ(1820)$ resonance, one with a narrow width and the other one with a large width. We contrast this fact with the recent BESIII measurement of the $K^- Λ$ mass distribution in the $ψ(3686)$ decay to $K^- Λ\barΞ^+ $, which demands a width much larger than the average of the PDG, and show how the consideration of the two $Ξ(1820)$ states provides a natural explanation to this apparent contradiction.
title One or two poles for the $Ξ(1820)$?
topic High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09610