Buchumschlag

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?

Fuente: arXiv

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Thelwall, Mike, Kurt, Zeyneb
Format:	Preprint
Veröffentlicht:	2024
Schlagworte:	Digital Libraries
Online-Zugang:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Ähnliche Einträge

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT
von: Nunkoo, Robin, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
von: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
von: Thelwall, Mike
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
von: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
von: Gray, Andrew
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
von: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks
von: Mike Thelwall
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
von: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
von: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
von: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
von: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
von: Hariri, Walid
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations
von: Chow, Eric H. C., et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2024)

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
von: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2025)

Authority Signals in AI Cited Health Sources: A Framework for Evaluating Source Credibility in ChatGPT Responses
von: Jacques, Erin, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2026)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
von: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2022)