Reply to: Limitations in odour recognition and generalisation in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2024
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866913579090837504 |
|---|---|
| author | Moyal, Roy Imam, Nabil Cleland, Thomas A. |
| author_facet | Moyal, Roy Imam, Nabil Cleland, Thomas A. |
| contents | Dennler et al. submit that they have discovered limitations affecting some of the conclusions drawn in our 2020 paper, Rapid online learning and robust recall in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit. Specifically, they assert (1) that the public dataset we used suffers from sensor drift and a nonrandomized measurement protocol, (2) that our neuromorphic EPL network is limited in its ability to generalize over repeated presentations of an odorant, and (3) that our EPL network results can be performance matched by using a more computationally efficient distance measure. Though they are correct in their description of the limitations of that public dataset, they do not acknowledge in their first two assertions how our utilization of those data sidestepped these limitations. Their third claim arises from flaws in the method used to generate their distance measure. We respond below to each of these three claims in turn. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_10456 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Reply to: Limitations in odour recognition and generalisation in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit Moyal, Roy Imam, Nabil Cleland, Thomas A. Neural and Evolutionary Computing Neurons and Cognition Dennler et al. submit that they have discovered limitations affecting some of the conclusions drawn in our 2020 paper, Rapid online learning and robust recall in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit. Specifically, they assert (1) that the public dataset we used suffers from sensor drift and a nonrandomized measurement protocol, (2) that our neuromorphic EPL network is limited in its ability to generalize over repeated presentations of an odorant, and (3) that our EPL network results can be performance matched by using a more computationally efficient distance measure. Though they are correct in their description of the limitations of that public dataset, they do not acknowledge in their first two assertions how our utilization of those data sidestepped these limitations. Their third claim arises from flaws in the method used to generate their distance measure. We respond below to each of these three claims in turn. |
| title | Reply to: Limitations in odour recognition and generalisation in a neuromorphic olfactory circuit |
| topic | Neural and Evolutionary Computing Neurons and Cognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10456 |