Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tangparitkul, Suparit, Akamine, Thakheru, Harbottle, David, Srisuriyachai, Falan, Yu, Kai
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15424
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909401075417088
author Tangparitkul, Suparit
Akamine, Thakheru
Harbottle, David
Srisuriyachai, Falan
Yu, Kai
author_facet Tangparitkul, Suparit
Akamine, Thakheru
Harbottle, David
Srisuriyachai, Falan
Yu, Kai
contents This study examines discrepancies in oil displacement mechanisms at equivalent interfacial tensions, focusing on the distinct contributions of surfactants and nanoparticles. It was hypothesized that similar interfacial activities would result in consistent displacement outcomes, while differences would reflect unique interfacial behaviors. Micromodel experiments revealed that at high interfacial tension (~20 mN/m), surfactants outperformed nanofluids in efficiency and ultimate oil recovery by reinforcing capillary forces. Conversely, nanofluids showed limited ability to modify interfacial forces. At lower interfacial tensions (6.5 mN/m for surfactants, 15.6 mN/m for nanofluids), both systems displayed similar displacement efficiencies and fingering patterns, driven by distinct mechanisms: capillary instability for surfactants and expansive layer flow for nanofluids. These findings challenge the assumption that nanofluids rely primarily on interfacial tension reduction for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and highlight the need to refine our understanding of nanoparticle interfacial activities. Future studies should extend these insights to core-scale experiments for a more comprehensive evaluation of two-phase flow dynamics.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_15424
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Discrepancy in Oil Displacement Mechanisms at the Equivalent Interfacial Tensions: Differentiating Contributions from Surfactant and Nanoparticles on Interfacial Activities
Tangparitkul, Suparit
Akamine, Thakheru
Harbottle, David
Srisuriyachai, Falan
Yu, Kai
Fluid Dynamics
This study examines discrepancies in oil displacement mechanisms at equivalent interfacial tensions, focusing on the distinct contributions of surfactants and nanoparticles. It was hypothesized that similar interfacial activities would result in consistent displacement outcomes, while differences would reflect unique interfacial behaviors. Micromodel experiments revealed that at high interfacial tension (~20 mN/m), surfactants outperformed nanofluids in efficiency and ultimate oil recovery by reinforcing capillary forces. Conversely, nanofluids showed limited ability to modify interfacial forces. At lower interfacial tensions (6.5 mN/m for surfactants, 15.6 mN/m for nanofluids), both systems displayed similar displacement efficiencies and fingering patterns, driven by distinct mechanisms: capillary instability for surfactants and expansive layer flow for nanofluids. These findings challenge the assumption that nanofluids rely primarily on interfacial tension reduction for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and highlight the need to refine our understanding of nanoparticle interfacial activities. Future studies should extend these insights to core-scale experiments for a more comprehensive evaluation of two-phase flow dynamics.
title Discrepancy in Oil Displacement Mechanisms at the Equivalent Interfacial Tensions: Differentiating Contributions from Surfactant and Nanoparticles on Interfacial Activities
topic Fluid Dynamics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15424