Pre-Big-Bang Cosmology Cannot Explain NANOGrav 15-year Signal

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, Qin, Wu, You, Liu, Lang
Format: Preprint
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910981387452416
author Tan, Qin
Wu, You
Liu, Lang
author_facet Tan, Qin
Wu, You
Liu, Lang
contents We investigate whether the Pre-Big Bang (PBB) scenario from string cosmology can explain the stochastic gravitational wave background signal reported in the NANOGrav 15-year dataset. Using Bayesian analysis techniques, we constrain the key parameters of the PBB model by comparing its theoretical predictions with the observed data. Our analysis yields $β= -0.12^{+0.06}_{-0.21}$ ($90\%$ credible interval) for the dilaton-dynamics parameter, which lies outside the theoretically allowed range $0 \leq β< 3$ with more than $5σ$ confidence. Additionally, model comparison strongly favors a simple power-law spectrum over the PBB scenario, with a Bayes factor of approximately $468$. These results demonstrate that the PBB scenario, in its current formulation, cannot adequately explain the NANOGrav observations, highlighting the need for either significant modifications to the model or alternative explanations for the observed signal.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_16505
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Pre-Big-Bang Cosmology Cannot Explain NANOGrav 15-year Signal
Tan, Qin
Wu, You
Liu, Lang
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
We investigate whether the Pre-Big Bang (PBB) scenario from string cosmology can explain the stochastic gravitational wave background signal reported in the NANOGrav 15-year dataset. Using Bayesian analysis techniques, we constrain the key parameters of the PBB model by comparing its theoretical predictions with the observed data. Our analysis yields $β= -0.12^{+0.06}_{-0.21}$ ($90\%$ credible interval) for the dilaton-dynamics parameter, which lies outside the theoretically allowed range $0 \leq β< 3$ with more than $5σ$ confidence. Additionally, model comparison strongly favors a simple power-law spectrum over the PBB scenario, with a Bayes factor of approximately $468$. These results demonstrate that the PBB scenario, in its current formulation, cannot adequately explain the NANOGrav observations, highlighting the need for either significant modifications to the model or alternative explanations for the observed signal.
title Pre-Big-Bang Cosmology Cannot Explain NANOGrav 15-year Signal
topic Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16505