Truth or Mirage? Towards End-to-End Factuality Evaluation with LLM-Oasis

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Scirè, Alessandro, Bejgu, Andrei Stefan, Tedeschi, Simone, Ghonim, Karim, Martelli, Federico, Navigli, Roberto
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2024
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866910899442286592
author Scirè, Alessandro
Bejgu, Andrei Stefan
Tedeschi, Simone
Ghonim, Karim
Martelli, Federico
Navigli, Roberto
author_facet Scirè, Alessandro
Bejgu, Andrei Stefan
Tedeschi, Simone
Ghonim, Karim
Martelli, Federico
Navigli, Roberto
contents After the introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs), there have been substantial improvements in the performance of Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, including Text Summarization and Machine Translation. However, LLMs still produce outputs containing hallucinations, that is, content not grounded in factual information. Therefore, developing methods to assess the factuality of LLMs has become urgent. Indeed, resources for factuality evaluation have recently emerged. Although challenging, these resources face one or more of the following limitations: (i) they are tailored to a specific task or domain; (ii) they are limited in size, thereby preventing the training of new factuality evaluators; (iii) they are designed for simpler verification tasks, such as claim verification. To address these issues, we introduce LLM-Oasis, to the best of our knowledge the largest resource for training end-to-end factuality evaluators. LLM-Oasis is constructed by extracting claims from Wikipedia, falsifying a subset of these claims, and generating pairs of factual and unfactual texts. We then rely on human annotators to both validate the quality of our dataset and to create a gold standard test set for benchmarking factuality evaluation systems. Our experiments demonstrate that LLM-Oasis presents a significant challenge for state-of-the-art LLMs, with GPT-4o achieving up to 60% accuracy in our proposed end-to-end factuality evaluation task, highlighting its potential to drive future research in the field.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_19655
institution arXiv
publishDate 2024
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Truth or Mirage? Towards End-to-End Factuality Evaluation with LLM-Oasis
Scirè, Alessandro
Bejgu, Andrei Stefan
Tedeschi, Simone
Ghonim, Karim
Martelli, Federico
Navigli, Roberto
Computation and Language
After the introduction of Large Language Models (LLMs), there have been substantial improvements in the performance of Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, including Text Summarization and Machine Translation. However, LLMs still produce outputs containing hallucinations, that is, content not grounded in factual information. Therefore, developing methods to assess the factuality of LLMs has become urgent. Indeed, resources for factuality evaluation have recently emerged. Although challenging, these resources face one or more of the following limitations: (i) they are tailored to a specific task or domain; (ii) they are limited in size, thereby preventing the training of new factuality evaluators; (iii) they are designed for simpler verification tasks, such as claim verification. To address these issues, we introduce LLM-Oasis, to the best of our knowledge the largest resource for training end-to-end factuality evaluators. LLM-Oasis is constructed by extracting claims from Wikipedia, falsifying a subset of these claims, and generating pairs of factual and unfactual texts. We then rely on human annotators to both validate the quality of our dataset and to create a gold standard test set for benchmarking factuality evaluation systems. Our experiments demonstrate that LLM-Oasis presents a significant challenge for state-of-the-art LLMs, with GPT-4o achieving up to 60% accuracy in our proposed end-to-end factuality evaluation task, highlighting its potential to drive future research in the field.
title Truth or Mirage? Towards End-to-End Factuality Evaluation with LLM-Oasis
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19655