Continuous Eddy Simulation (CES): Conceptual approach and applications
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866909409109606400 |
|---|---|
| author | Heinz, Stefan Fagbade, Adeyemi |
| author_facet | Heinz, Stefan Fagbade, Adeyemi |
| contents | The simulation of high Reynolds number (Re) separated turbulent flows faces significant problems for decades: large eddy simulation (LES) is computationally too expensive, and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods and hybrid RANS-LES methods often provide unreliable results. This has serious consequences, we are currently unable to reliably predict very high Re regimes, which hampers applications and our understanding of turbulence structures. The paper reports the advantages of a strict mathematical approach, continuous eddy simulation (CES), to derive partially resolving turbulence models. In contrast to popular hybrid RANS-LES, this minimal error approach includes a dynamic modification of the turbulence model in response to the actual flow resolution: the model can increase (decrease) its contribution to the simulation in dependence of a low (high) flow resolution. This property is the essential requirement to seamlessly cover RANS and LES regimes. The CES modeling approach offers essential advantages regarding its functionality: basically, it is independent of a variety of simulation settings applied in popular hybrid RANS-LES to improve the model performance. In addition, the CES computational cost can be below the cost of other hybrid RANS-LES and LES by orders of magnitude. Essential simulation performance advantages of CES simulations are described here with respect to three complex flow applications: periodic hill flows at high Reynolds number, the NASA wall-mounted hump flow, and the Bachalo & Johnson axisymmetric transonic bump flow. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2411_19834 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Continuous Eddy Simulation (CES): Conceptual approach and applications Heinz, Stefan Fagbade, Adeyemi Fluid Dynamics The simulation of high Reynolds number (Re) separated turbulent flows faces significant problems for decades: large eddy simulation (LES) is computationally too expensive, and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods and hybrid RANS-LES methods often provide unreliable results. This has serious consequences, we are currently unable to reliably predict very high Re regimes, which hampers applications and our understanding of turbulence structures. The paper reports the advantages of a strict mathematical approach, continuous eddy simulation (CES), to derive partially resolving turbulence models. In contrast to popular hybrid RANS-LES, this minimal error approach includes a dynamic modification of the turbulence model in response to the actual flow resolution: the model can increase (decrease) its contribution to the simulation in dependence of a low (high) flow resolution. This property is the essential requirement to seamlessly cover RANS and LES regimes. The CES modeling approach offers essential advantages regarding its functionality: basically, it is independent of a variety of simulation settings applied in popular hybrid RANS-LES to improve the model performance. In addition, the CES computational cost can be below the cost of other hybrid RANS-LES and LES by orders of magnitude. Essential simulation performance advantages of CES simulations are described here with respect to three complex flow applications: periodic hill flows at high Reynolds number, the NASA wall-mounted hump flow, and the Bachalo & Johnson axisymmetric transonic bump flow. |
| title | Continuous Eddy Simulation (CES): Conceptual approach and applications |
| topic | Fluid Dynamics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19834 |